It's a bit confusing, but Keycloak server is still technically a war under the covers, that's why setting it like that works. I wonder if we could just rename the war to drop the war extension and then it would just be "keycloak-server" and we could remove all the talk about war and name changes.

On 24 May 2016 at 10:53, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:

Because today we no longer distribute/deploy war files to get Keycloak up and
running, but I can be wrong and totally missing the point here. Also, I couldn't
find any reference at the docs to deploy that WAR, or generate it with -Pdistribution.

On 2016-05-24, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> We're completely redoing the docs at the moment.
>
> Why do you say that section is not valid, at a quick glance it looks ok to
> me.
>
> On 23 May 2016 at 22:10, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
>
> > Ahoy, I was looking at 3.4 section from our docs (
> > https://keycloak.github.io/docs/userguide/keycloak-server/html/server-installation.html).
> > I believe this section is no longer valid, right?
> >
> > If yes, I'm planning to remove it or should we replace with some
> > alternative?
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >

--

abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914