I think we should either go with on/off or yes/no. Then rewrite the labels where it doesn't make post-M1.

My vote goes for yes/no

----- Original Message -----

From: "Gabriel Cardoso" <gcardoso@redhat.com>

To: keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org

Sent: Tuesday, 26 November, 2013 2:00:35 PM

Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] On/off toggles

To me, "ON" means enabled and "OFF" means disabled. Se when we have, Social

Login: ON/OFF, that's fine because it is like Social Login:

enabled/disabled.

The problem might be in the label "Enabled". Can we find a better label?

Maybe "Status": ON/OFF ?

Gabriel

On Nov 26, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Alexandre Mendonca wrote:

I agree that at some places YES/NO makes more sense, while ON/OFF may suit

better in other.. the directive defaults to ON/OFF but accepts parameters

such as on-text="YES" off-text="NO" to accommodate different usages.

I can't really decide on one.. Reset Password: YES/NO doesn't seem a good

fit, for instance... but using different ones may be confusing.

Alexandre

From: "Stian Thorgersen" < stian@redhat.com >

To: keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org

Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 12:51:24 PM

Subject: [keycloak-dev] On/off toggles

For a few places where the on/off toggles are used the labels on/off doesn't

make sense. For example:

Enabled: on/off

Cookie login allowed: on/off

Would it not be better with yes/no? That seems to work in all cases

_______________________________________________

keycloak-dev mailing list

keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

_______________________________________________

keycloak-dev mailing list

keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

--

Gabriel Cardoso

GateIn Portal | User Experience Designer

_______________________________________________

keycloak-dev mailing list

keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev