This isn't true of our non-Spring adapters.  So, if you have a PR we
welcome it!

On 9/28/2015 4:22 PM, Andrzej Goławski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've started to use keycloak with spring security and found that the
> name and location of keycloak.json file was hardcoded. IMO it would be
> better to allow injection of the configuration file name via constructor
> in AdapterDeploymentContextBean by developer. Thus, I would be able to
> use different keycloak configurations with different spring profiles.
> What do you think about it?
>
> Best Regards,
>   Andrzej
>
>

> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>

--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev