Hi,

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Thomas Darimont <thomas.darimont@googlemail.com> wrote:
would you mind sharing your keycloak configuration with a JMS resource-adapter?

Here are the changes I made to standalone/configuration/standalone.xml:

1. Added the following extension under /server/extensions:

<extension module="org.wildfly.extension.messaging-activemq"/>

2. Added the following subsystem under /server/profile:

<subsystem xmlns="urn:jboss:domain:messaging-activemq:1.0">
    <server name="default">
        <security enabled="false" /> <!-- I didn't need to use security as everything was localhost -->
        <remote-acceptor name="netty" socket-binding="messaging"/>
        <remote-connector name="netty" socket-binding="messaging"/>
        <in-vm-acceptor name="in-vm" server-id="0"/>
        <in-vm-connector name="in-vm" server-id="0"/>
        <pooled-connection-factory name="activemq-ra"
                    transaction="xa" connectors="in-vm"
                    entries="java:/ConnectionFactory java:/JmsXA java:jboss/DefaultJMSConnectionFactory"/>
        <jms-topic name="KeycloakEvents" entries="jms/KeycloakEvents java:jboss/exported/jms/KeycloakEvents" />
    </server>
</subsystem>

3. Added the following socket-binding under /server/socket-binding-group:

<socket-binding name="messaging" port="61616"/>

This enabled my external process to listen to the JMS topic. 

I attached a full example to this message. The changes have been marked with <!-- keycloak-events-jms -->.

Did you manage to configure a new resource-adapter via jboss-cli?

No, I haven't used jboss-cli but modified the configuration file directly.

My implementation of KEYCLOAK-2302 can be found at Github: https://github.com/raehalme/keycloak/tree/KEYCLOAK-2302.

I have not sent a PR as I have yet to complete the Arquillian integration tests requested by Stian. Other work has kept me busy and I haven't had a chance to even rebase against 1.9.x.

Best regards,
Thomas