Sorry, makes sense now after reading your exchange. In practice though, does it matter to have this split? Is it not better to consolidate into one client?
On 12/7/2015 3:48 AM, Marek Posolda wrote:
+1. That's what we have now and it's good pattern IMO.
Marek
On 07/12/15 09:38, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Should we not have one client for the roles that represents the
services (bearer-only), then have a separate clients for admin GUI and
CLI?
On 7 December 2015 at 09:34, Marek Posolda <mposolda@redhat.com
<mailto:mposolda@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 03/12/15 20:06, Bill Burke wrote:
> * We can remove the realm-management client in each realm and
just merge
> the roles into security-admin-console.
Not sure about this one TBH. Also in 1.7 we introduced the "admin-cli"
client, which is used for direct-grants and has scope to
realm-management similarly like security-admin-console. The
security-admin-console is used for UI of admin console (javascript
client) when admin-cli is used for direct access to admin REST
endpoints
for example from admin-client.
Marek
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev