I think he is perhaps saying that developers who don't speak English should be able to learn and use Keycloak out of the box.Got no clue what you're saying
On 15 September 2015 at 13:35, Lennart Jörelid <lennart.jorelid@gmail.com> wrote:
That is - in itself - a problem for an application with works-out-of-the-Box aspirations, yes?
// vänlig hälsning,// [sw: "best regards"],//// Lennart JörelidWhy would we need i18n/l10n for examples? We don't provide internationalization of applications themselves.
On 15 September 2015 at 10:02, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow@redhat.com> wrote:
I would rather keep them simple.
We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then it would fit.
--
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert@redhat.com> wrote:
> Wondering...
>
> Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
>
> Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it? Right now,
> they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
Bolesław Dawidowicz
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
_______________________________________________ keycloak-dev mailing list keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev