that probably makes sense to merge, as long as the utils api is still available after the merge

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Sebastien Blanc <sblanc@redhat.com> wrote:
I know at least one project (a mbass solution)  that is planning to replace some "manual" code by using the keycloak-nodejs-auth-utils module. It's in an integration layer and it only needs to handle token/grant retrieval and refresh.
But I don't think it would be a real problem if this module  is merged  with connect.



On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
Good morning,

Today the only use case scenario for
keycloak-nodejs-auth-utils is the usage with keycloak-nodejs-connect for
authorization. Besides that I don't see any reason to have it as a
separate module. Unless we have plans for new modules like Passport
strategies, or embed the authorization bits in some framework
non-related with Connect.

What do you guys think about merge auth-utils codebase into
keycloak-nodejs-connect?

--

abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev


_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev