That will be my next task. Currently I'm focused on claims which will
be done this week or next.
I want to bring in PL SAML code soon, because it effects claim mapping.
I'm writing an SPI so that the admin can write a protocol mapper that
can change the SAML document however they like.
On 2/18/2015 8:35 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
When are you planning to move PL SAML code to KC (at least types and
parsers) ? The issue I mentioned will require a release and update of PL dependency in KC.
Want to avoid that every time we find a similar issue.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 12:05:54 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] From 1.2->2.0
I want to refactor the Builders I wrote so they can be user consumable.
What I want to have is a SAML SPI in which the SPI interface is passed
a Builder. Then the SPI plugin can modify the document however they
want. We'll need something similar for OIDC.
On 2/16/2015 6:48 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 2:38:08 PM
>> Subject: [keycloak-dev] From 1.2->2.0
>>
>> I think we still have a few major features to implement for 1.2 and
>> maybe 1.3. After this I'd like to focus on Keycloak 2.0 things like:
>>
>> * Improving and nailing down our SPIs
>> * Splitting up code into private and public models so we can restrict
>> what APIs/SPIs we want to commercially support
>> * Pulling in and refactoring PL Federation
>
> I've an issue [1] in the SAML parsers that needs a fix. I don't know what are
your plans for this, but I think we can start moving PL SAML types and parsers to KC ? Do
you want/need a refactoring for them ?
>
> Or the refactoring you always talk about is around the SAML processing logic ? Such
as handlers, etc ...
>
> [1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-883
>
>> * Consolidating and improving our admin console UI
>>
>> Really starting improving the core of Keycloak knowing that Keycloak 2.0
>> is what we're going to be supporting commercially for years and years
>> going forward.
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>
http://bill.burkecentral.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>