Hi,
is there a way to explicitly declare keycloak module as dependency?

I've searched about similar issues [1], and it might be connected to the way interceptors are declared. To me, it seems like keycloak.js doesn't inject routerConfig the right (angular) way, but I might be wrong here.

[1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28212837/keycloak-unknown-provider-error
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Bartosz Andrzejczak <ba.andrzejczak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Dejan,

See this: https://docs.angularjs.org/error/$injector/strictdi

Just define your dependencies explicitly like this:

angular.module(‘myModule’).controller(‘test’, [‘$scope’, function ($scope) {
  ...
}]);

or use ng-annotate [1] with your build system to do that for you.

[1] https://github.com/olov/ng-annotate
On 22 Apr 2016, at 11:11 AM, Dejan B <dejan.benedik@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

we encountered a worrisome error while developing a SPA with Angular 1.5.3 and Keycloak 1.9.1 for authentication.
If we run the application with strict dependency injection, bootstraping will fail with the following error:

Error: [$injector:modulerr] Failed to instantiate module zis due to:
[$injector:strictdi] routerConfig is not using explicit annotation and cannot be invoked in strict mode

Without strict DI, the application runs fine, but the issue occurs every time we try to run minified code.
How could we solve this problem?

Cheers, Dejan
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user