Well I didn't mean exactly the same message with a link and everything, but just something like "This is not a policy definition."

Best regards,
Thomas

On Apr 14, 2016 17:03, "Stian Thorgersen" <sthorger@redhat.com> wrote:
I don't think the Google way is good for us as we'd need to have a similar page. Further, it wouldn't be correct to have a Keycloak page that describes the policy for other companies. So we need to figure out what the correct value should be I think.

On 14 April 2016 at 16:00, Thomas Raehalme <thomas.raehalme@aitiofinland.com> wrote:

W3C has the spec but since nobody is really using this I don't think the value matters. But instead of making up some policy definition I think that the Google way would be the best. What do you think?

Best regards,
Thomas

On Apr 14, 2016 16:54, "Stian Thorgersen" <sthorger@redhat.com> wrote:
I've got no clue what the value should be, tried to search on Google, but doesn't make much sense to me.

On 14 April 2016 at 15:30, Jukka Sirviö <Jukka.Sirvio@mipro.fi> wrote:
there is discussion on this issue, also on stack overflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32120129/keycloak-is-causing-ie-to-have-an-infinite-loop

“Header always set P3P "CP=ALL DSP COR CUR ADM PSA CONi OUR SAM OTR UNR LEG"”


Lähettäjä: keycloak-user-bounces@lists.jboss.org [mailto:keycloak-user-bounces@lists.jboss.org] Puolesta Thomas Raehalme
Lähetetty: 14. huhtikuuta 2016 16:22
Vastaanottaja: Stian Thorgersen
Kopio: keycloak-user
Aihe: Re: [keycloak-user] JavaScript client, iframe and IE

I created KEYCLOAK-2828 for this issue and will do a PR as well.

What do you think the value should be? As I wrote earlier it does not seem to make a difference to IE.

Best regards,
Thomas


On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger@redhat.com> wrote:
Can you create a JIRA for it please? If you fancy doing a PR you can add the header to LoginStatusIframeEndpoint.

On 14 April 2016 at 15:09, Thomas Raehalme <thomas.raehalme@aitiofinland.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger@redhat.com> wrote:
What do you mean about "if the URL is something like"?

The only iframe Keycloak uses is in the JavaScript adapter and it's only the session iframe. That would be the only place it would be relevant for Keycloak to set P3P header, but don't think it's need AFAIK it works just fine on IE.

Sorry for being a little too vague.

Among other UIs our application has a web front-end based on AngularJS and it's utilizing the JavaScript adapter for authentication. When I login to the application I can inspect the HTML and see an <iframe /> element with the following URL:

https://keycloak-server/auth/realms/xxxx/protocol/openid-connect/login-status-iframe.html?client_id=xxxx&origin=xxxx

Without the P3P header there is an eternal loop between our web front-end and Keycloak where the browser is being redirected from one to the other. After adding the P3P header the problem was solved.

Best regards,
Thomas



________________________________

Tämä sähköpostiviesti (liitteineen) saattaa sisältää luottamuksellista tietoa, joka on tarkoitettu
vain vastaanottajalleen. Jos et ole oikea vastaanottaja, ilmoita viestin lähettäjälle tapahtuneesta
virheestä ja tuhoa viesti välittömästi. Viestin luvaton julkaiseminen, kopioiminen, jakelu tai muu
käyttö tai toimenpiteisiin ryhtyminen sen perusteella on ehdottomasti kielletty.

This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential information intended for
the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, notify the
sender and delete this message immediately. Notice that disclosing, copying, distributing or any
other use of the message and its information, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

________________________________