Hi all,

I'm integrating keycloak.js with the Red Hat Customer Portal and have a
question about passing a configuration object into the Keycloak()
constructor.

At the point where I call Keycloak(), I'm attempting to avoid waiting
for the keycloak.json HTTP GET by inlining keycloak.json during a build
step.  By example, my build now produces this:

    var keycloak = new Keycloak({
        "realm" : "myRealm",
        "realm-public-key" : "myPublicKey",
        "auth-server-url" : "https://keycloak.me/auth",
        "ssl-required" : "external",
        "resource" : "myClientId",
        "public-client" : true,
        "token-store": "cookie"
    });

I was hoping this would Just Work, but I quickly discovered that some of
the properties are "renamed" after the HTTP request:

    kc.authServerUrl = config['auth-server-url'];
    kc.realm = config['realm'];
    kc.clientId = config['resource'];
    kc.clientSecret = (config['credentials'] || {})['secret'];

And thus my setup doesn't work because "clientId" doesn't exist inside
keycloak.json.

My question is: would I be foolish to rename the properties inside
keycloak.json so that the JSON can be passed directly into the Keycloak
constructor?  For example, "resource" becomes "clientId" and
"auth-server-url" becomes "authServerUrl".

It would be really convenient if I could give keycloak.js the contents
of keycloak.json without having to fret about where it came from (AJAX
or hardcoded or build-inlined).  If others would like that feature too,
I'd happily put together a contribution.

Thanks for any advice!

--
Michael Clayton
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user