Thank you guys for the answers, I think you & Stian directed me to the right way, so it should solve my requirements.

Best regards,
Bystrik



On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Thomas Darimont <thomas.darimont@googlemail.com> wrote:

You could define the set of secret questions on the authenticator - you could either hardcode them or make them configurable by implementing ConfiguredProvider see [0].
Then you could store a reference to the selected secret question and the answer as a custom user-attribute.

Cheers,

Thomas

[0] - https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/60f9f73c4ca2ddf4ad49ff53a03a63dca8148ea9/server-spi/src/main/java/org/keycloak/provider/ConfiguredProvider.java#L26


Stian Thorgersen <sthorger@redhat.com> schrieb am Mo., 22. Feb. 2016, 13:40:
I thought the example did allow configuring the security question on the authenticator, but you can create your own that does it. Then the security questions are configured on the authenticator itself. 

On 22 February 2016 at 13:24, Bystrik Horvath <bystrik.horvath@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I went through the example (https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/master/examples/providers/authenticator). The security questions are written in secret-question.ftl and secret-question-config.ftl files. From my point of view, the security questions are know in advance and they can be "hardcoded" in ftl files. My case is that security questions are defined during the runtime (preferably via  admin REST API). The admin REST API does not provide the functionality to store attributes on realm level. I agree that security questions belongs to realm, but how to provision them - *.ftl files are not an option for me.

Best regards,
Bystrik

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger@redhat.com> wrote:
If you look at our security questions example it stores the configuration on the authenticator itself.

On 22 February 2016 at 12:46, Bystrik Horvath <bystrik.horvath@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

what would be a recommended way to provision a security question on realm base if the question is not known in advance? May be it is an misuse of client representation for provisioning that.

Best regards,
Bystrik

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger@redhat.com> wrote:
I don't understand how you can have security questions that are particular to a client. A user logs-in to a realm, not a client.

On 22 February 2016 at 10:20, Juraj Janosik <juraj.janosik77@gmail.com> wrote:
@ Stian:
generally said, I did not find any description, that the client attributes are for internal use only.
Parameter "attributes" is propagated in ClientRepresentation in the REST Admin API,
therefore should be used for CRUD admin operations.
We plan to attach Security Answers to the user (Security questions are common for particular client).

Best Regards,
Juraj

2016-02-22 10:18 GMT+01:00 Bystrik Horvath <bystrik.horvath@gmail.com>:
Hi,

I think the case here is to provision the text of security question to the client attributes when it is not known in advance.

Best regards,
Bystrik

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Thomas Darimont <thomas.darimont@googlemail.com> wrote:
Interesting - do you need client specific security questions?

The keycloak examples contain a custom provider for user specific security questions - perhaps this would suit your needs better.

Cheers,
Thomas

2016-02-22 10:02 GMT+01:00 Juraj Janosik <juraj.janosik77@gmail.com>:
Hi Thomas,

for example security questions.... :-)

Best Regards,
Juraj



2016-02-22 9:12 GMT+01:00 Thomas Darimont <thomas.darimont@googlemail.com>:
Hello Juraj,

I wondered about that too a while ago - may I ask what client attributes you are planning to store?

Cheers,
Thomas

2016-02-22 8:17 GMT+01:00 Juraj Janosik <juraj.janosik77@gmail.com>:
The user configuration has the possibility to Create/Read/Update/Delete of "custom" attributes in the Admin Console.
(/auth/admin/master/console/#/realms/demo/users/{uid}/user-attributes)
The client does not. I think, the logic and the focus is the same for both.

Best regards,
Juraj


2016-02-19 15:40 GMT+01:00 Stian Thorgersen <sthorger@redhat.com>:

We don't. Why would we add it though?

On 18 Feb 2016 12:43, "Juraj Janosik" <juraj.janosik77@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

is there any plan to support for displaying of "attributes" from Client Representation
(like users configuration) in Admin Console?

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Juraj

_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user


_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user




_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user







_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user