Hi,

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Thomas Darimont <thomas.darimont@googlemail.com> wrote:

yes I understand that - and I agree that falling back to the default client in case of a missing client is not a good idea.

I understand this as well, but it has not been uncommon to encounter a situation where the user needs to know where to go next, because Keycloak doesn't have a link available.

Maybe and hopefully it's just related to the development phase when applications are redeployed often.

@Thomas
Initially I also thought about having a default redirect url per realm but then I thought that simply refering to a client_id and let keycloak redirect the user
appropriatly would be more flexible, especially because you can then also leverage all the client metadata that is available for a client (name, description etc.).

Defining an existing client as a default is indeed a better idea. I probably misunderstood you first.

Best regards,

Thomas