Yeah, i was lazy about that and forgot to put a check in later on.

On 1/11/2016 2:40 AM, Juraj Janosik wrote:

Hi,

is it a correct and expected behaviour in the group concept,
that the name of the group is not unique,

that means, that it is possible to create a new group with the same name?

The same behaviour occurs in Admin console and via REST API too.

[
    {
        "id": "150a8547-fd3f-4245-ab91-328d8afb83c2",
        "name": "group_tests",
        "path": "/group_tests",
        "subGroups":
        [
        ]
    },
    {
        "id": "bc7969e6-e7c9-4617-b03e-18665293636a",
        "name": "group_tests",
        "path": "/group_tests",
        "subGroups":
        [
        ]
    },
    {
        "id": "5447d305-a47e-4ad9-a29b-f478396accf6",
        "name": "group_tests",
        "path": "/group_tests",
        "subGroups":
        [
        ]
    }
]

Thanks.

Best Regards,

Juraj

_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com

_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user