Hey guys,

I just looked at the login mechanism and the communication between the admin console and the backend in the alpha 2 release again. If I'm not mistaken, you used to use HTTP-only for the KEYCLOAK_SAAS_IDENTITY cookie. Did something change about that in alpha 2? When I look at the HTTP requests in the chrome developer console, I don't see the HttpOnly flag anywhere.

Cheers,
Nils


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Stian Thorgersen <stian@redhat.com> wrote:


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke@redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, 30 January, 2014 3:46:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Keycloak and OAuth 2.0 Resource Owner Password Credentials Grant
>
>
>
> On 1/30/2014 9:29 AM, Nils Preusker wrote:
> > Hey Bill, thanks for the clarification, I didn't realize that the cookie
> > was Http-only, neat!
> >
> > We are building a pure HTML5 client that is also hosted separately from
> > the REST-backends. The thing is that we use a reverse proxy so for the
> > browser it all looks like one app since everything comes from different
> > paths in the same domain.
> >
> > I'll try to clarify the last part of my last mail: We are currently
> > using org.jboss.resteasy.skeleton.key.as7.OAuthAuthenticationServerValve
> > (skeleton-key-as7) in our REST-backend modules. If I'm not mistaken,
> > some parts of the code base and concepts are the same as in keycloak,
> > right?
> >
> > So far, in the AngularJS application we've been adding bearer tokens to
> > the HTTP Authorization header. Since the backend uses JAX-RS/ RestEasy,
> > the verification of the bearer tokens was done transparently by
> > OAuthAuthenticationServerValve and RESTEasy automatically added the
> > roles etc. to the HttpServletRequest. Now in the REST backend of the
> > admin app in keycloak you're doing the same thing (validating the tokens
> > and extracting the roles) manually with the AuthenticationManager
> > (authenticateSaasIdentityCookie(...)). So I was just wondering whether
> > you are planning to make that process more transparent in the future?
> >
>
> We're doing it manually because the original idea was that the admin
> service could manage multiple organizations  (a SaaS), so you'd have to
> set up the cookie path's correctly.
>
> For your app, it sounds like @RolesAllowed will work.  You just have to
> set up the appropriate web.xml security constraints for your REST urls
> in web.xml.  Just set up the REST apis to require authentication and let
> @RolesAllowed do the rest.  The keycloak jboss/wildfly adapter can
> handle BEARER token auth at the same time as regular browser oauth.  If
> the server is initiating the login, then you can just follow the current
> keycloak examples.  If not, then the Javascript lib Stian wrote is an
> option (and something we'll have to document).

JS lib needs a bit of work as well, if it's something you want I can make it a priority

>
>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user