Actually we've been quite busy in the testland. After our release, we
can discuss a proper backlog for auth-utils.

On 2016-04-26, Helio Frota wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Thanks !
>
> But and about the users of keycloak-nodejs-auth-utils ?
>
> ( https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-nodejs-auth-utils )
>
> We are going with a mix of "public client" and "confidential" approaches ?
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
>
> > Try this:
> > https://gist.github.com/abstractj/4cd2231a472069d8b6f63b4008c74061
> >
> > On 2016-04-25, Helio Frota wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I found a shell script to use the new introspection path to do token
> > > validation:
> > > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/2016-April/005869.html
> > >
> > > I'm using public client and by removing :
> > >
> > > KC_CLIENT_SECRET=a-test-client-credental
> > >
> > > The result is:
> > >
> > > {"error_description":"Authentication failed.","error":"invalid_request"}
> > >
> > > It is possible to use validation token for public clients ?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > keycloak-user mailing list
> > > keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> >

> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user


--

abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914