5:49 a.m.
I think you got the 403 due to it already being registered.
There should be two versions available 1.0-beta3 and 1.0-beta4-pre. Once we release
1.0.final it'll be tagged as 1.0. The 1.0-beta3 syntax should work as jQuery uses it
;)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com>
To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>, keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wednesday, 30 July, 2014 9:13:21 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
So I've tried to register this package for you guys using bower:
~/play/keycloak-js-bower master 14:08:22
$ bower register keycloak git://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
bower keycloak#* resolve git://
github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#*
bower keycloak#* checkout master
bower keycloak#* resolved git://
github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#923dccb251
[?] Registering a package will make it installable via the registry (
https://bower.herokuapp.com), continue? Yes
bower keycloak register git://
github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
bower EUNKNOWN Unknown error: 403
I am afraid this could be due to the version number possibly being in an
incorrect format.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <josh(a)psidox.com>
wrote:
> I removed the "keycloak" package, the name should be open for
registration
> now.
>
> Still bit skeptical it will accept anything other than "x.x.x" notation
> for versioning but give it a try. :)
>
> - Josh
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Have you contacted the Bower guys to get this changed yet?
>>
>> By the way we're going to stick with the same versioning that we use for
>> Keycloak except we'll remove -final from the final release. So versions
>> would be:
>>
>> 1.0-beta4
>> 1.0-rc1
>> 1.0
>>
>> That should mean that versions such as ">=1.0" will work, and will
only
>> use stable versions, while if someone wants to use a beta or rc they can
>> explicitly specify the version.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
>> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
>> > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > Sent: Thursday, 3 July, 2014 4:46:09 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> >
>> > I do think there is a problem using that version format, I think I
>> tried it
>> > originally and bower was having none of it. This could be because they
>> use
>> > version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can use a "~"
character to
>> > prefix the version to allow upgrades in version minors in the bower.json
>> > file.
>> >
>> > eg.
>> > "dependencies": {
>> > "keycloak": "~0.3.12"
>> > },
>> >
>> >
>> > I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark side a little bit, it do
>> enjoy
>> > npm / bower for doing javascript type build processes (sometimes a
>> > necessary evil). I was never a a fan of 'grunt' but found that
'gulp'
>> is
>> > much better. I have a hybrid build process in my java apps where I
>> > sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp build processes.
>> >
>> > But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm / gulp' adds a lot
of
>> > complexity to build process and is not desirable.
>> >
>> > I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak switched over to your fork
>> :D
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I've pulled in your stuff to
>> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
>> > >
>> > > I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak versions
(1.0-beta-2,
>> > > 1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if that'll be a problem?
>> > >
>> > > Also, I'm going to add minification of keycloak.js to our Maven
build.
>> > > We'll need it there as well + we're mainly Java/Maven guys ;)
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
>> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
>> > > > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > > > Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
>> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> > > >
>> > > > Looks like it's a manual process at the moment to get
registry
>> moved to a
>> > > > different github endpont. Let me know when you have the project
>> setup
>> > > and
>> > > > I'll contact the bower guys.
>> > > >
>> > > > - Josh
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > You bet, I actually had the thought that it would be better
as
>> part of
>> > > the
>> > > > > release cycle. I'll have to figure out how to transfer
bower
>> > > repositories
>> > > > > because there was no login required to register a bower repo
and
>> > > currently
>> > > > > I have taken "keycloak" which would be optimal for
the project.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
>> stian(a)redhat.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Hi Josh,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> That's great - thanks for contributing this. I would
like to
>> transfer
>> > > > >> this to https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your
happy
>> with
>> > > that.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Thanks,
>> > > > >> Stian
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
>> > > > >> > To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
>> > > > >> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Hi guys,
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > I have created a little github project to make
keycloak.js
>> > > available to
>> > > > >> bower
>> > > > >> > package manager .
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Project here:
>> > > > >> > https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Usage:
>> > > > >> > $ bower install keycloak
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > - Josh
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > > > >> > keycloak-user mailing list
>> > > > >> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
11:29 a.m.
New subject: Bower for keycloak.js
I went through the deletion process so shouldn't be registered anymore.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I think you got the 403 due to it already being registered.
There should be two versions available 1.0-beta3 and 1.0-beta4-pre. Once
we release 1.0.final it'll be tagged as 1.0. The 1.0-beta3 syntax should
work as jQuery uses it ;)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>, keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 July, 2014 9:13:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>
> So I've tried to register this package for you guys using bower:
>
> ~/play/keycloak-js-bower master 14:08:22
>
> $ bower register keycloak git://
github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
>
> bower keycloak#* resolve git://
> github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#*
>
> bower keycloak#* checkout master
>
> bower keycloak#* resolved git://
> github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#923dccb251
>
> [?] Registering a package will make it installable via the registry (
> https://bower.herokuapp.com), continue? Yes
>
> bower keycloak register git://
> github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
>
> bower EUNKNOWN Unknown error: 403
>
>
> I am afraid this could be due to the version number possibly being in an
> incorrect format.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <josh(a)psidox.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I removed the "keycloak" package, the name should be open for
registration
> > now.
> >
> > Still bit skeptical it will accept anything other than "x.x.x"
notation
> > for versioning but give it a try. :)
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Have you contacted the Bower guys to get this changed yet?
> >>
> >> By the way we're going to stick with the same versioning that we use
for
> >> Keycloak except we'll remove -final from the final release. So
versions
> >> would be:
> >>
> >> 1.0-beta4
> >> 1.0-rc1
> >> 1.0
> >>
> >> That should mean that versions such as ">=1.0" will work, and
will
only
> >> use stable versions, while if someone wants to use a beta or rc they
can
> >> explicitly specify the version.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> >> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> >> > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> > Sent: Thursday, 3 July, 2014 4:46:09 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >> >
> >> > I do think there is a problem using that version format, I think I
> >> tried it
> >> > originally and bower was having none of it. This could be because
they
> >> use
> >> > version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can use a "~"
character to
> >> > prefix the version to allow upgrades in version minors in the
bower.json
> >> > file.
> >> >
> >> > eg.
> >> > "dependencies": {
> >> > "keycloak": "~0.3.12"
> >> > },
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark side a little bit,
it
do
> >> enjoy
> >> > npm / bower for doing javascript type build processes (sometimes a
> >> > necessary evil). I was never a a fan of 'grunt' but found
that
'gulp'
> >> is
> >> > much better. I have a hybrid build process in my java apps where I
> >> > sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp build processes.
> >> >
> >> > But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm / gulp' adds a
lot
of
> >> > complexity to build process and is not desirable.
> >> >
> >> > I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak switched over to your
fork
> >> :D
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen
<stian(a)redhat.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I've pulled in your stuff to
> >> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
> >> > >
> >> > > I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak versions
(1.0-beta-2,
> >> > > 1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if that'll be a problem?
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, I'm going to add minification of keycloak.js to our
Maven
build.
> >> > > We'll need it there as well + we're mainly Java/Maven
guys ;)
> >> > >
> >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> >> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> >> > > > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> > > > Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
> >> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Looks like it's a manual process at the moment to get
registry
> >> moved to a
> >> > > > different github endpont. Let me know when you have the
project
> >> setup
> >> > > and
> >> > > > I'll contact the bower guys.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Josh
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > You bet, I actually had the thought that it would be
better as
> >> part of
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > release cycle. I'll have to figure out how to
transfer bower
> >> > > repositories
> >> > > > > because there was no login required to register a bower
repo
and
> >> > > currently
> >> > > > > I have taken "keycloak" which would be
optimal for the
project.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
> >> stian(a)redhat.com>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> Hi Josh,
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> That's great - thanks for contributing this. I
would like to
> >> transfer
> >> > > > >> this to https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope
your
happy
> >> with
> >> > > that.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Thanks,
> >> > > > >> Stian
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > > >> > From: "Josh"
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> >> > > > >> > To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> > > > >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
> >> > > > >> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for
keycloak.js
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > Hi guys,
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > I have created a little github project to make
keycloak.js
> >> > > available to
> >> > > > >> bower
> >> > > > >> > package manager .
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > Project here:
> >> > > > >> >
https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > Usage:
> >> > > > >> > $ bower install keycloak
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > - Josh
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
_______________________________________________
> >> > > > >> > keycloak-user mailing list
> >> > > > >> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> > > > >> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
12:36 p.m.
New subject: Bower for keycloak.js
I re-registered it after that though
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com>
To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>, keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, 31 July, 2014 4:29:49 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
I went through the deletion process so shouldn't be registered anymore.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I think you got the 403 due to it already being registered.
>
> There should be two versions available 1.0-beta3 and 1.0-beta4-pre. Once
> we release 1.0.final it'll be tagged as 1.0. The 1.0-beta3 syntax should
> work as jQuery uses it ;)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com>
> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>, keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, 30 July, 2014 9:13:21 PM
> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >
> > So I've tried to register this package for you guys using bower:
> >
> > ~/play/keycloak-js-bower master 14:08:22
> >
> > $ bower register keycloak git://
> github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
> >
> > bower keycloak#* resolve git://
> > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#*
> >
> > bower keycloak#* checkout master
> >
> > bower keycloak#* resolved git://
> > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#923dccb251
> >
> > [?] Registering a package will make it installable via the registry (
> > https://bower.herokuapp.com), continue? Yes
> >
> > bower keycloak register git://
> > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
> >
> > bower EUNKNOWN Unknown error: 403
> >
> >
> > I am afraid this could be due to the version number possibly being in an
> > incorrect format.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <josh(a)psidox.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I removed the "keycloak" package, the name should be open for
> registration
> > > now.
> > >
> > > Still bit skeptical it will accept anything other than "x.x.x"
notation
> > > for versioning but give it a try. :)
> > >
> > > - Josh
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Stian Thorgersen
<stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Have you contacted the Bower guys to get this changed yet?
> > >>
> > >> By the way we're going to stick with the same versioning that we
use
> for
> > >> Keycloak except we'll remove -final from the final release. So
> versions
> > >> would be:
> > >>
> > >> 1.0-beta4
> > >> 1.0-rc1
> > >> 1.0
> > >>
> > >> That should mean that versions such as ">=1.0" will work,
and will
> only
> > >> use stable versions, while if someone wants to use a beta or rc they
> can
> > >> explicitly specify the version.
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > >> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> > >> > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >> > Sent: Thursday, 3 July, 2014 4:46:09 PM
> > >> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> > >> >
> > >> > I do think there is a problem using that version format, I think
I
> > >> tried it
> > >> > originally and bower was having none of it. This could be
because
> they
> > >> use
> > >> > version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can use a
"~"
> character to
> > >> > prefix the version to allow upgrades in version minors in the
> bower.json
> > >> > file.
> > >> >
> > >> > eg.
> > >> > "dependencies": {
> > >> > "keycloak": "~0.3.12"
> > >> > },
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark side a little
bit, it
> do
> > >> enjoy
> > >> > npm / bower for doing javascript type build processes (sometimes
a
> > >> > necessary evil). I was never a a fan of 'grunt' but
found that
> 'gulp'
> > >> is
> > >> > much better. I have a hybrid build process in my java apps where
I
> > >> > sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp build
processes.
> > >> >
> > >> > But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm / gulp'
adds a lot
> of
> > >> > complexity to build process and is not desirable.
> > >> >
> > >> > I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak switched over to
your
> fork
> > >> :D
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen
<stian(a)redhat.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I've pulled in your stuff to
> > >> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak versions
> (1.0-beta-2,
> > >> > > 1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if that'll be a
problem?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Also, I'm going to add minification of keycloak.js to
our Maven
> build.
> > >> > > We'll need it there as well + we're mainly
Java/Maven guys ;)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > >> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen"
<stian(a)redhat.com>
> > >> > > > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >> > > > Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
> > >> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Looks like it's a manual process at the moment to
get registry
> > >> moved to a
> > >> > > > different github endpont. Let me know when you have
the project
> > >> setup
> > >> > > and
> > >> > > > I'll contact the bower guys.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Josh
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > You bet, I actually had the thought that it would
be better as
> > >> part of
> > >> > > the
> > >> > > > > release cycle. I'll have to figure out how to
transfer bower
> > >> > > repositories
> > >> > > > > because there was no login required to register a
bower repo
> and
> > >> > > currently
> > >> > > > > I have taken "keycloak" which would be
optimal for the
> project.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen
<
> > >> stian(a)redhat.com>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >> Hi Josh,
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> That's great - thanks for contributing
this. I would like to
> > >> transfer
> > >> > > > >> this to https://github.com/keycloak though, I
hope your
> happy
> > >> with
> > >> > > that.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Thanks,
> > >> > > > >> Stian
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > > >> > From: "Josh"
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > >> > > > >> > To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >> > > > >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
> > >> > > > >> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for
keycloak.js
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > Hi guys,
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > I have created a little github project to
make keycloak.js
> > >> > > available to
> > >> > > > >> bower
> > >> > > > >> > package manager .
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > Project here:
> > >> > > > >> >
https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > Usage:
> > >> > > > >> > $ bower install keycloak
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > - Josh
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> >
_______________________________________________
> > >> > > > >> > keycloak-user mailing list
> > >> > > > >> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >> > > > >> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
2:10 p.m.
New subject: Bower for keycloak.js
Woot, okay.. just making sure it's working.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I re-registered it after that though
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>, keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, 31 July, 2014 4:29:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>
> I went through the deletion process so shouldn't be registered anymore.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> > I think you got the 403 due to it already being registered.
> >
> > There should be two versions available 1.0-beta3 and 1.0-beta4-pre.
Once
> > we release 1.0.final it'll be tagged as 1.0. The 1.0-beta3 syntax
should
> > work as jQuery uses it ;)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com>
> > > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>,
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 30 July, 2014 9:13:21 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> > >
> > > So I've tried to register this package for you guys using bower:
> > >
> > > ~/play/keycloak-js-bower master 14:08:22
> > >
> > > $ bower register keycloak git://
> > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
> > >
> > > bower keycloak#* resolve git://
> > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#*
> > >
> > > bower keycloak#* checkout master
> > >
> > > bower keycloak#* resolved git://
> > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#923dccb251
> > >
> > > [?] Registering a package will make it installable via the registry (
> > > https://bower.herokuapp.com), continue? Yes
> > >
> > > bower keycloak register git://
> > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
> > >
> > > bower EUNKNOWN Unknown error: 403
> > >
> > >
> > > I am afraid this could be due to the version number possibly being
in an
> > > incorrect format.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <
josh(a)psidox.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I removed the "keycloak" package, the name should be open
for
> > registration
> > > > now.
> > > >
> > > > Still bit skeptical it will accept anything other than
"x.x.x"
notation
> > > > for versioning but give it a try. :)
> > > >
> > > > - Josh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Have you contacted the Bower guys to get this changed yet?
> > > >>
> > > >> By the way we're going to stick with the same versioning that
we
use
> > for
> > > >> Keycloak except we'll remove -final from the final release.
So
> > versions
> > > >> would be:
> > > >>
> > > >> 1.0-beta4
> > > >> 1.0-rc1
> > > >> 1.0
> > > >>
> > > >> That should mean that versions such as ">=1.0" will
work, and will
> > only
> > > >> use stable versions, while if someone wants to use a beta or rc
they
> > can
> > > >> explicitly specify the version.
> > > >>
> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > > >> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > >> > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > >> > Sent: Thursday, 3 July, 2014 4:46:09 PM
> > > >> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I do think there is a problem using that version format, I
think I
> > > >> tried it
> > > >> > originally and bower was having none of it. This could be
because
> > they
> > > >> use
> > > >> > version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can use a
"~"
> > character to
> > > >> > prefix the version to allow upgrades in version minors in
the
> > bower.json
> > > >> > file.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > eg.
> > > >> > "dependencies": {
> > > >> > "keycloak": "~0.3.12"
> > > >> > },
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark side a
little bit,
it
> > do
> > > >> enjoy
> > > >> > npm / bower for doing javascript type build processes
(sometimes a
> > > >> > necessary evil). I was never a a fan of 'grunt' but
found that
> > 'gulp'
> > > >> is
> > > >> > much better. I have a hybrid build process in my java apps
where I
> > > >> > sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp build
processes.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm /
gulp' adds a
lot
> > of
> > > >> > complexity to build process and is not desirable.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak switched
over to
your
> > fork
> > > >> :D
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > I've pulled in your stuff to
> > > >> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak
versions
> > (1.0-beta-2,
> > > >> > > 1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if that'll be a
problem?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Also, I'm going to add minification of keycloak.js
to our
Maven
> > build.
> > > >> > > We'll need it there as well + we're mainly
Java/Maven guys ;)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> > > > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen"
<stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > >> > > > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > >> > > > Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
> > > >> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for
keycloak.js
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Looks like it's a manual process at the moment
to get
registry
> > > >> moved to a
> > > >> > > > different github endpont. Let me know when you
have the
project
> > > >> setup
> > > >> > > and
> > > >> > > > I'll contact the bower guys.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > - Josh
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > You bet, I actually had the thought that it
would be
better as
> > > >> part of
> > > >> > > the
> > > >> > > > > release cycle. I'll have to figure out
how to transfer
bower
> > > >> > > repositories
> > > >> > > > > because there was no login required to
register a bower
repo
> > and
> > > >> > > currently
> > > >> > > > > I have taken "keycloak" which would
be optimal for the
> > project.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian
Thorgersen <
> > > >> stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >> Hi Josh,
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> That's great - thanks for
contributing this. I would
like to
> > > >> transfer
> > > >> > > > >> this to https://github.com/keycloak
though, I hope your
> > happy
> > > >> with
> > > >> > > that.
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> > > > >> Stian
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> > > > >> > From: "Josh"
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > >> > To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > >> > > > >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02
PM
> > > >> > > > >> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for
keycloak.js
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > Hi guys,
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > I have created a little github
project to make
keycloak.js
> > > >> > > available to
> > > >> > > > >> bower
> > > >> > > > >> > package manager .
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > Project here:
> > > >> > > > >> >
https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > Usage:
> > > >> > > > >> > $ bower install keycloak
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > - Josh
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> >
_______________________________________________
> > > >> > > > >> > keycloak-user mailing list
> > > >> > > > >> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > >> > > > >> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
2:10 p.m.
New subject: Bower for keycloak.js
I never heard back :P
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <josh(a)psidox.com>
wrote:
Woot, okay.. just making sure it's working.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> I re-registered it after that though
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com>
> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>, keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 31 July, 2014 4:29:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> >
> > I went through the deletion process so shouldn't be registered anymore.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I think you got the 403 due to it already being registered.
> > >
> > > There should be two versions available 1.0-beta3 and 1.0-beta4-pre.
> Once
> > > we release 1.0.final it'll be tagged as 1.0. The 1.0-beta3 syntax
> should
> > > work as jQuery uses it ;)
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com>
> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>,
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, 30 July, 2014 9:13:21 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> > > >
> > > > So I've tried to register this package for you guys using bower:
> > > >
> > > > ~/play/keycloak-js-bower master 14:08:22
> > > >
> > > > $ bower register keycloak git://
> > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
> > > >
> > > > bower keycloak#* resolve git://
> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#*
> > > >
> > > > bower keycloak#* checkout master
> > > >
> > > > bower keycloak#* resolved git://
> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#923dccb251
> > > >
> > > > [?] Registering a package will make it installable via the registry
> (
> > > > https://bower.herokuapp.com), continue? Yes
> > > >
> > > > bower keycloak register git://
> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
> > > >
> > > > bower EUNKNOWN Unknown error: 403
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am afraid this could be due to the version number possibly being
> in an
> > > > incorrect format.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <
> josh(a)psidox.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I removed the "keycloak" package, the name should be
open for
> > > registration
> > > > > now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Still bit skeptical it will accept anything other than
"x.x.x"
> notation
> > > > > for versioning but give it a try. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > - Josh
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
> stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Have you contacted the Bower guys to get this changed yet?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> By the way we're going to stick with the same versioning
that we
> use
> > > for
> > > > >> Keycloak except we'll remove -final from the final
release. So
> > > versions
> > > > >> would be:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 1.0-beta4
> > > > >> 1.0-rc1
> > > > >> 1.0
> > > > >>
> > > > >> That should mean that versions such as ">=1.0"
will work, and
> will
> > > only
> > > > >> use stable versions, while if someone wants to use a beta or
rc
> they
> > > can
> > > > >> explicitly specify the version.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > > > >> > To: "Stian Thorgersen"
<stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > > >> > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > > >> > Sent: Thursday, 3 July, 2014 4:46:09 PM
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I do think there is a problem using that version format,
I
> think I
> > > > >> tried it
> > > > >> > originally and bower was having none of it. This could
be
> because
> > > they
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> > version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can use a
"~"
> > > character to
> > > > >> > prefix the version to allow upgrades in version minors
in the
> > > bower.json
> > > > >> > file.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > eg.
> > > > >> > "dependencies": {
> > > > >> > "keycloak": "~0.3.12"
> > > > >> > },
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark side a
little
> bit, it
> > > do
> > > > >> enjoy
> > > > >> > npm / bower for doing javascript type build processes
> (sometimes a
> > > > >> > necessary evil). I was never a a fan of 'grunt'
but found that
> > > 'gulp'
> > > > >> is
> > > > >> > much better. I have a hybrid build process in my java
apps
> where I
> > > > >> > sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp build
> processes.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm /
gulp' adds a
> lot
> > > of
> > > > >> > complexity to build process and is not desirable.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak switched
over to
> your
> > > fork
> > > > >> :D
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
> stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > I've pulled in your stuff to
> > > > >> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak
versions
> > > (1.0-beta-2,
> > > > >> > > 1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if that'll
be a problem?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Also, I'm going to add minification of
keycloak.js to our
> Maven
> > > build.
> > > > >> > > We'll need it there as well + we're mainly
Java/Maven guys ;)
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > >> > > > From: "Josh"
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen"
<stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > > >> > > > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > > >> > > > Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
> > > > >> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for
keycloak.js
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Looks like it's a manual process at the
moment to get
> registry
> > > > >> moved to a
> > > > >> > > > different github endpont. Let me know when
you have the
> project
> > > > >> setup
> > > > >> > > and
> > > > >> > > > I'll contact the bower guys.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > - Josh
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > You bet, I actually had the thought that
it would be
> better as
> > > > >> part of
> > > > >> > > the
> > > > >> > > > > release cycle. I'll have to figure
out how to transfer
> bower
> > > > >> > > repositories
> > > > >> > > > > because there was no login required to
register a bower
> repo
> > > and
> > > > >> > > currently
> > > > >> > > > > I have taken "keycloak" which
would be optimal for the
> > > project.
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian
Thorgersen <
> > > > >> stian(a)redhat.com>
> > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >> Hi Josh,
> > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > >> That's great - thanks for
contributing this. I would
> like to
> > > > >> transfer
> > > > >> > > > >> this to https://github.com/keycloak
though, I hope your
> > > happy
> > > > >> with
> > > > >> > > that.
> > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> > > > >> Stian
> > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > >> > > > >> > From: "Josh"
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > >> > To:
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > > >> > > > >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014
6:30:02 PM
> > > > >> > > > >> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower
for keycloak.js
> > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > >> > Hi guys,
> > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > >> > I have created a little github
project to make
> keycloak.js
> > > > >> > > available to
> > > > >> > > > >> bower
> > > > >> > > > >> > package manager .
> > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > >> > Project here:
> > > > >> > > > >> >
https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
> > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > >> > Usage:
> > > > >> > > > >> > $ bower install keycloak
> > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > >> > - Josh
> > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > >> >
_______________________________________________
> > > > >> > > > >> > keycloak-user mailing list
> > > > >> > > > >> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > > >> > > > >> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
4:38 a.m.
New subject: Bower for keycloak.js
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com>
To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>, keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, 31 July, 2014 7:10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
I never heard back :P
Sorry about that, been a few hectic weeks at camp Keycloak ;)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <josh(a)psidox.com>
wrote:
> Woot, okay.. just making sure it's working.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I re-registered it after that though
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com>
>> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
>> > Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>,
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > Sent: Thursday, 31 July, 2014 4:29:49 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> >
>> > I went through the deletion process so shouldn't be registered
anymore.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think you got the 403 due to it already being registered.
>> > >
>> > > There should be two versions available 1.0-beta3 and 1.0-beta4-pre.
>> Once
>> > > we release 1.0.final it'll be tagged as 1.0. The 1.0-beta3 syntax
>> should
>> > > work as jQuery uses it ;)
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com>
>> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
>> > > > Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>,
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, 30 July, 2014 9:13:21 PM
>> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> > > >
>> > > > So I've tried to register this package for you guys using
bower:
>> > > >
>> > > > ~/play/keycloak-js-bower master 14:08:22
>> > > >
>> > > > $ bower register keycloak git://
>> > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
>> > > >
>> > > > bower keycloak#* resolve git://
>> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#*
>> > > >
>> > > > bower keycloak#* checkout master
>> > > >
>> > > > bower keycloak#* resolved git://
>> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#923dccb251
>> > > >
>> > > > [?] Registering a package will make it installable via the
registry
>> (
>> > > > https://bower.herokuapp.com), continue? Yes
>> > > >
>> > > > bower keycloak register git://
>> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
>> > > >
>> > > > bower EUNKNOWN Unknown error: 403
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I am afraid this could be due to the version number possibly
being
>> in an
>> > > > incorrect format.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <
>> josh(a)psidox.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I removed the "keycloak" package, the name should
be open for
>> > > registration
>> > > > > now.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Still bit skeptical it will accept anything other than
"x.x.x"
>> notation
>> > > > > for versioning but give it a try. :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - Josh
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
>> stian(a)redhat.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Have you contacted the Bower guys to get this changed
yet?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> By the way we're going to stick with the same
versioning that we
>> use
>> > > for
>> > > > >> Keycloak except we'll remove -final from the final
release. So
>> > > versions
>> > > > >> would be:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> 1.0-beta4
>> > > > >> 1.0-rc1
>> > > > >> 1.0
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> That should mean that versions such as
">=1.0" will work, and
>> will
>> > > only
>> > > > >> use stable versions, while if someone wants to use a
beta or rc
>> they
>> > > can
>> > > > >> explicitly specify the version.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com>
>> > > > >> > To: "Stian Thorgersen"
<stian(a)redhat.com>
>> > > > >> > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >> > Sent: Thursday, 3 July, 2014 4:46:09 PM
>> > > > >> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > I do think there is a problem using that version
format, I
>> think I
>> > > > >> tried it
>> > > > >> > originally and bower was having none of it. This
could be
>> because
>> > > they
>> > > > >> use
>> > > > >> > version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can
use a "~"
>> > > character to
>> > > > >> > prefix the version to allow upgrades in version
minors in the
>> > > bower.json
>> > > > >> > file.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > eg.
>> > > > >> > "dependencies": {
>> > > > >> > "keycloak": "~0.3.12"
>> > > > >> > },
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark
side a little
>> bit, it
>> > > do
>> > > > >> enjoy
>> > > > >> > npm / bower for doing javascript type build
processes
>> (sometimes a
>> > > > >> > necessary evil). I was never a a fan of
'grunt' but found that
>> > > 'gulp'
>> > > > >> is
>> > > > >> > much better. I have a hybrid build process in my
java apps
>> where I
>> > > > >> > sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp
build
>> processes.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm
/ gulp' adds a
>> lot
>> > > of
>> > > > >> > complexity to build process and is not desirable.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak
switched over to
>> your
>> > > fork
>> > > > >> :D
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen
<
>> stian(a)redhat.com>
>> > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > I've pulled in your stuff to
>> > > > >> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > I'd prefer the versions to match with
Keycloak versions
>> > > (1.0-beta-2,
>> > > > >> > > 1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if
that'll be a problem?
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > Also, I'm going to add minification of
keycloak.js to our
>> Maven
>> > > build.
>> > > > >> > > We'll need it there as well + we're
mainly Java/Maven guys ;)
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >> > > > From: "Josh"
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
>> > > > >> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen"
<stian(a)redhat.com>
>> > > > >> > > > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >> > > > Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
>> > > > >> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for
keycloak.js
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > Looks like it's a manual process at
the moment to get
>> registry
>> > > > >> moved to a
>> > > > >> > > > different github endpont. Let me know
when you have the
>> project
>> > > > >> setup
>> > > > >> > > and
>> > > > >> > > > I'll contact the bower guys.
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > - Josh
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > You bet, I actually had the thought
that it would be
>> better as
>> > > > >> part of
>> > > > >> > > the
>> > > > >> > > > > release cycle. I'll have to
figure out how to transfer
>> bower
>> > > > >> > > repositories
>> > > > >> > > > > because there was no login required
to register a bower
>> repo
>> > > and
>> > > > >> > > currently
>> > > > >> > > > > I have taken "keycloak"
which would be optimal for the
>> > > project.
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM,
Stian Thorgersen <
>> > > > >> stian(a)redhat.com>
>> > > > >> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >> Hi Josh,
>> > > > >> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > >> That's great - thanks for
contributing this. I would
>> like to
>> > > > >> transfer
>> > > > >> > > > >> this to
https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your
>> > > happy
>> > > > >> with
>> > > > >> > > that.
>> > > > >> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > >> Thanks,
>> > > > >> > > > >> Stian
>> > > > >> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >> > > > >> > From: "Josh"
<smysnk(a)gmail.com>
>> > > > >> > > > >> > To:
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >> > > > >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014
6:30:02 PM
>> > > > >> > > > >> > Subject: [keycloak-user]
Bower for keycloak.js
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> > Hi guys,
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> > I have created a little
github project to make
>> keycloak.js
>> > > > >> > > available to
>> > > > >> > > > >> bower
>> > > > >> > > > >> > package manager .
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> > Project here:
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> > Usage:
>> > > > >> > > > >> > $ bower install keycloak
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> > - Josh
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
_______________________________________________
>> > > > >> > > > >> > keycloak-user mailing list
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>> > > > >> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
3554
days inactive
3555
days old
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Joshua Bellamy-Henn -
Stian Thorgersen