[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-332) Record message resubmission details against situation
by Gary Brown (JIRA)
Gary Brown created RTGOV-332:
--------------------------------
Summary: Record message resubmission details against situation
Key: RTGOV-332
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-332
Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance)
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: User Interface
Reporter: Gary Brown
Assignee: Gary Brown
When message is resubmitted, record the date/time, who resubmitted it, and the status of the resubmission (success/fail) in the properties of the situation, and saved back to the db.
If these properties exist on a situation - when the situation details are displayed, they should be displayed on the Message tab, so that user avoids resubmitting again if previously successful.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-330) Allow situations to be allocated/assigned to individual
by Gary Brown (JIRA)
Gary Brown created RTGOV-330:
--------------------------------
Summary: Allow situations to be allocated/assigned to individual
Key: RTGOV-330
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-330
Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance)
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: User Interface
Reporter: Gary Brown
Assignee: Gary Brown
Allow a situation to be assigned to a user. To avoid maintaining list of users (for now), we will use a ‘take’ approach, so the currently logged in user can ‘take’ responsibility for a situation (if not already associated with another user). This will result in their username being associated with a property on the situation, and the situation being recorded back to the db.
Once the user is responsible for the situation, they should have the ability to set its status. Current status values will be Unresolved (default value upon a situation being assigned) and Resolved.
To avoid the scenario where a situation remains associated with a user while no action is being taken, it should be possible for a more privileged user to be able to 'take' it from another assigned user. This may only happen if this user has a 'management' role - to be discussed further.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-329) Consider refactoring/cleanup of ActivtyServerLogger
by Jiri Pechanec (JIRA)
Jiri Pechanec created RTGOV-329:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Consider refactoring/cleanup of ActivtyServerLogger
Key: RTGOV-329
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-329
Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance)
Issue Type: Quality Risk
Components: Activity Collector
Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Final
Reporter: Jiri Pechanec
Assignee: Gary Brown
1) I consider the code to be overcomplicated - are we really getting any performance boost with reusing the ArrayList of events? I found on the web that clear() might be even slower than new allocation
2) There is unsynced access to fields _sequenceNumber and _failuresSinceLastSuccess
3) I am not sure if it is wise to mix synchronization on Java level - _timer in BatchedActivityUnitLogger - and Java EE level - method synchornization on @Singleton
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-328) Activity Server should support async processing of submitted events
by Jiri Pechanec (JIRA)
Jiri Pechanec created RTGOV-328:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Activity Server should support async processing of submitted events
Key: RTGOV-328
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-328
Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance)
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Activity Server
Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Final
Reporter: Jiri Pechanec
Assignee: Gary Brown
Activity Collector does not care about return value from activity server invocation. Thus the api should provide a method that will allow submit activities in one-way fashion. The REST invocation will return immediately and the activities will be stored in storage asynchronously in another thread.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months