September 2014 - overlord-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-586) UI ServicesProvider impls should be located using commons ServiceRegistry

by Gary Brown (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gary Brown commented on RTGOV-586: ---------------------------------- Also added ActionProvider abstraction to avoid having to extend the ServicesProvider interface when new actions are added. > UI ServicesProvider impls should be located using commons ServiceRegistry > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-586 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-586 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.Final > > > Currently the RTGov UI uses CDI to locate the provider implementations. Change this to use the commons ServiceRegistry, to make it easier to plug in new providers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

10 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-586) UI ServicesProvider impls should be located using commons ServiceRegistry

by Gary Brown (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gary Brown resolved RTGOV-586. ------------------------------ Resolution: Done > UI ServicesProvider impls should be located using commons ServiceRegistry > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-586 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-586 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.Final > > > Currently the RTGov UI uses CDI to locate the provider implementations. Change this to use the commons ServiceRegistry, to make it easier to plug in new providers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

10 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-586) UI ServicesProvider impls should be located using commons ServiceRegistry

by Gary Brown (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gary Brown updated RTGOV-586: ----------------------------- Git Pull Request: https://github.com/Governance/rtgov/pull/214 > UI ServicesProvider impls should be located using commons ServiceRegistry > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-586 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-586 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.Final > > > Currently the RTGov UI uses CDI to locate the provider implementations. Change this to use the commons ServiceRegistry, to make it easier to plug in new providers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

10 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-586) UI ServicesProvider impls should be located using commons ServiceRegistry

by Gary Brown (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gary Brown updated RTGOV-586: ----------------------------- Summary: UI ServicesProvider impls should be located using commons ServiceRegistry (was: UI providers should be located using commons ServiceRegistry) > UI ServicesProvider impls should be located using commons ServiceRegistry > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-586 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-586 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.Final > > > Currently the RTGov UI uses CDI to locate the provider implementations. Change this to use the commons ServiceRegistry, to make it easier to plug in new providers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

10 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-586) UI providers should be located using commons ServiceRegistry

by Gary Brown (JIRA)

Gary Brown created RTGOV-586: -------------------------------- Summary: UI providers should be located using commons ServiceRegistry Key: RTGOV-586 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-586 Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) Issue Type: Task Reporter: Gary Brown Assignee: Gary Brown Fix For: 2.0.0.Final Currently the RTGov UI uses CDI to locate the provider implementations. Change this to use the commons ServiceRegistry, to make it easier to plug in new providers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

10 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-568) Update elasticsearch to 1.3.2

by Gary Brown (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gary Brown commented on RTGOV-568: ---------------------------------- Decision made to base rtgov 2.0.0..Final on JDK 1.7, so this change is now fine. > Update elasticsearch to 1.3.2 > ----------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-568 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-568 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.Final > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

10 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-568) Update elasticsearch to 1.3.2

by Gary Brown (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gary Brown updated RTGOV-568: ----------------------------- Fix Version/s: 2.0.0.Final (was: 2.1.0.Final) > Update elasticsearch to 1.3.2 > ----------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-568 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-568 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.Final > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

10 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-568) Update elasticsearch to 1.3.2

by Gary Brown (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gary Brown resolved RTGOV-568. ------------------------------ Resolution: Done > Update elasticsearch to 1.3.2 > ----------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-568 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-568 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.Final > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

10 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-585) Fuse: Sending {"amount":400, "customer":"Fred"} results in Unrecognized field "amount"

by Andrej Vano (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Andrej Vano updated RTGOV-585: ------------------------------ Steps to Reproduce: 1. install fuse, switchyard 2.0.0.Alpha2, overlord beta4 (rtgov-all, rtgov-switchyard) 2. install all quickstarts 3. send requests until you see "Customer Fred is suspended" 4. send request {"amount":400,"customer":"Fred"} was: 1. install fuse, switchyard 2.0.0.Alpha2, overlord beta4 2. install all quickstarts 3. send requests until you see "Customer Fred is suspended" 4. send request {"amount":400,"customer":"Fred"} > Fuse: Sending {"amount":400,"customer":"Fred"} results in Unrecognized field "amount" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-585 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-585 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Andrej Vano > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.Final > > > Based on the documentation I'm sending the request {"amount":400,"customer":"Fred"} but the response is: > Unrecognized field "amount" (Class org.overlord.rtgov.quickstarts.demos.ordermgmt.model.Order), not marked as ignorable > at [Source: java.io.ByteArrayInputStream@822005f; line: 1, column: 14] (through reference chain: org.overlord.rtgov.quickstarts.demos.ordermgmt.model.Order["amount"]) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

10 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-329) Consider refactoring/cleanup of ActivtyServerLogger

by Gary Brown (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gary Brown closed RTGOV-329. ---------------------------- Resolution: Rejected > Consider refactoring/cleanup of ActivtyServerLogger > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-329 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-329 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: Activity Collector > Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Final > Reporter: Jiri Pechanec > Assignee: Gary Brown > Attachments: Performance.java > > > 1) I consider the code to be overcomplicated - are we really getting any performance boost with reusing the ArrayList of events? I found on the web that clear() might be even slower than new allocation > 2) There is unsynced access to fields _sequenceNumber and _failuresSinceLastSuccess > 3) I am not sure if it is wise to mix synchronization on Java level - _timer in BatchedActivityUnitLogger - and Java EE level - method synchornization on @Singleton -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

10 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

overlord-issues September 2014