[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-586) UI providers should be located using commons ServiceRegistry
by Gary Brown (JIRA)
Gary Brown created RTGOV-586:
--------------------------------
Summary: UI providers should be located using commons ServiceRegistry
Key: RTGOV-586
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-586
Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance)
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Gary Brown
Assignee: Gary Brown
Fix For: 2.0.0.Final
Currently the RTGov UI uses CDI to locate the provider implementations. Change this to use the commons ServiceRegistry, to make it easier to plug in new providers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
10 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-585) Fuse: Sending {"amount":400, "customer":"Fred"} results in Unrecognized field "amount"
by Andrej Vano (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Andrej Vano updated RTGOV-585:
------------------------------
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install fuse, switchyard 2.0.0.Alpha2, overlord beta4 (rtgov-all, rtgov-switchyard)
2. install all quickstarts
3. send requests until you see "Customer Fred is suspended"
4. send request {"amount":400,"customer":"Fred"}
was:
1. install fuse, switchyard 2.0.0.Alpha2, overlord beta4
2. install all quickstarts
3. send requests until you see "Customer Fred is suspended"
4. send request {"amount":400,"customer":"Fred"}
> Fuse: Sending {"amount":400,"customer":"Fred"} results in Unrecognized field "amount"
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RTGOV-585
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-585
> Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Andrej Vano
> Assignee: Gary Brown
> Fix For: 2.0.0.Final
>
>
> Based on the documentation I'm sending the request {"amount":400,"customer":"Fred"} but the response is:
> Unrecognized field "amount" (Class org.overlord.rtgov.quickstarts.demos.ordermgmt.model.Order), not marked as ignorable
> at [Source: java.io.ByteArrayInputStream@822005f; line: 1, column: 14] (through reference chain: org.overlord.rtgov.quickstarts.demos.ordermgmt.model.Order["amount"])
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
10 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-329) Consider refactoring/cleanup of ActivtyServerLogger
by Gary Brown (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Gary Brown closed RTGOV-329.
----------------------------
Resolution: Rejected
> Consider refactoring/cleanup of ActivtyServerLogger
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RTGOV-329
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-329
> Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance)
> Issue Type: Quality Risk
> Components: Activity Collector
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Jiri Pechanec
> Assignee: Gary Brown
> Attachments: Performance.java
>
>
> 1) I consider the code to be overcomplicated - are we really getting any performance boost with reusing the ArrayList of events? I found on the web that clear() might be even slower than new allocation
> 2) There is unsynced access to fields _sequenceNumber and _failuresSinceLastSuccess
> 3) I am not sure if it is wise to mix synchronization on Java level - _timer in BatchedActivityUnitLogger - and Java EE level - method synchornization on @Singleton
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
10 years, 2 months