]
Eric Wittmann commented on SRAMP-439:
-------------------------------------
My initial thought here is that as long as we support OWL related features in the UI and
not in the repository itself, we shouldn't have any spec-compliance issues. We might
consider implementing at least a sensible subset of the OWL Lite and OWL specifications as
UI features.
Add support for exclusive classifiers
-------------------------------------
Key: SRAMP-439
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SRAMP-439
Project: S-RAMP
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Core, Governance, UI
Reporter: Anton Giertli
Assignee: Brett Meyer
Priority: Optional
The requested feature talks about possibility to make some Classifiers exclusive. Imagine
class Gender and two subclasses Male and Female, defined in the ontology.
If it was possible to make these classifiers exclusive, it would be possible, via S-RAMP
UI to set only *one* of those.
i.e. user can't set Male if Female is set.
i.e. user can't set Female is Male is set.
OWL Language should be capable of creating such constructs by using owl:disjointWith
attribute
http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/#owl_disjointWith
However, this attribute is part of OWL DL and not OWL Lite which is currently used.