Consider removing artifact/content updates ------------------------------------------ Key: SRAMP-541 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SRAMP-541 Project: S-RAMP Issue Type: Enhancement Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) Reporter: Brett Meyer Assignee: Brett Meyer Fix For: 0.6.0 From [~eric.wittmann] on SRAMP-539: {quote} In particular, updates are problematic with regard to derived content. What do we do with the derived artifacts if we change the content? Presumably we would delete them and re-derive. But if we do that, we might lose meta-data added to those derived artifacts manually by users. There may also be relationships that have been formed on those derived artifacts, in which case referential integrity will prevent them from being deleted, and the update will fail. All in all I am disappointed in myself for implementing the updateContent feature to begin with. {quote} I also agree that updateContent and artifact updates should probably be removed entirely. It's caused quite a bit of confusion, is only partially implemented, and could cause quite a bit of harm in real-world use cases.