September 2013 - overlord-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (SRAMP-233) Check for null logger in s-ramp wagon

by Eric Wittmann (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SRAMP-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Work on SRAMP-233 started by Eric Wittmann. > Check for null logger in s-ramp wagon > ------------------------------------- > > Key: SRAMP-233 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SRAMP-233 > Project: S-RAMP > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: Client > Affects Versions: 0.3.0 - JBPM6 Integration > Reporter: Eric Wittmann > Assignee: Eric Wittmann > Fix For: 0.3.1 - jBPM - bugfix 1 > > > In certain use cases the wagon will not be injected with the logger. Make sure to check for null before using it. Once that is done, remove the SrampWagonProxy class from dtgov. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (SRAMP-237) Demo (s-ramp-demos-switchyard) not properly deploying

by Eric Wittmann (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SRAMP-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Eric Wittmann commented on SRAMP-237: ------------------------------------- While the demo is being modified, make sure the artifact type is "SwitchYardApplication" with the proper casing. > Demo (s-ramp-demos-switchyard) not properly deploying > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SRAMP-237 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SRAMP-237 > Project: S-RAMP > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Affects Versions: 0.3.0 - JBPM6 Integration > Reporter: Eric Wittmann > Assignee: Eric Wittmann > Fix For: 0.3.1 - jBPM - bugfix 1 > > > The s-ramp-demos-switchyard demo is not working because it's missing some markup in the demo profile to re-enable deployments. Deployments are being skipped (presumably due to a setting in a parent pom) and need to be explicitly un-skipped in the demo pom. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-268) Service response time aggregation not performed correctly for min/max values

by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] RH Bugzilla Integration commented on RTGOV-268: ----------------------------------------------- Gary Brown <gbrown(a)redhat.com> made a comment on [bug 1004173|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004173] Have applied a change to the mvel script (https://github.com/Governance/rtgov/commit/9c547e723ff0608835c9992dcab3bf...) - could you try this out, as not sure whether this is related to the issue you are seeing. If not, then can you provide more information to help reproduce the problem scenario. > Service response time aggregation not performed correctly for min/max values > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-268 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-268 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.M1 > > > Currently the min/max values are based on the extreme avg values being aggregated. > However the min/max values should also be aggregated, to get a better mean value over these properties. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-268) Service response time aggregation not performed correctly for min/max values

by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] RH Bugzilla Integration updated RTGOV-268: ------------------------------------------ Bugzilla Update: Perform Bugzilla References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004173 > Service response time aggregation not performed correctly for min/max values > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-268 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-268 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.M1 > > > Currently the min/max values are based on the extreme avg values being aggregated. > However the min/max values should also be aggregated, to get a better mean value over these properties. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-268) Service response time aggregation not performed correctly for min/max values

by Gary Brown (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gary Brown resolved RTGOV-268. ------------------------------ Resolution: Done > Service response time aggregation not performed correctly for min/max values > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-268 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-268 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.M1 > > > Currently the min/max values are based on the extreme avg values being aggregated. > However the min/max values should also be aggregated, to get a better mean value over these properties. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-259) DroolsEventProcessor session caching not isolated or protected from redeployments

by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] RH Bugzilla Integration commented on RTGOV-259: ----------------------------------------------- Nick Cross <ncross(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1000393|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000393] from MODIFIED to ON_QA > DroolsEventProcessor session caching not isolated or protected from redeployments > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-259 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-259 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.M1 > > > Drools sessions are cached based on rule names, which are not necessarily unique across EPNs. > When the drools event processor is initialised, it is associated with an EPNContext. However if it already exists, this is not done. Therefore the issue is when a new version of an EPN is deployed, the rule will remain associated with the original EPNContext. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-260) Incorrect loop counter init in JMXNotifier when removing listeners

by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] RH Bugzilla Integration commented on RTGOV-260: ----------------------------------------------- Nick Cross <ncross(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1001594|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001594] from MODIFIED to ON_QA > Incorrect loop counter init in JMXNotifier when removing listeners > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: RTGOV-260 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-260 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.M1 > > > Loop counter incorrect initialized to list size rather than -1. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-258) DroolsEventProcessor should fail deployment if rule not found

by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] RH Bugzilla Integration commented on RTGOV-258: ----------------------------------------------- Nick Cross <ncross(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1000350|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000350] from MODIFIED to ON_QA > DroolsEventProcessor should fail deployment if rule not found > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-258 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-258 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.M1 > > > If the named rule does not exist, or has an error, then the EPN should fail to deploy. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-258) DroolsEventProcessor should fail deployment if rule not found

by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] RH Bugzilla Integration commented on RTGOV-258: ----------------------------------------------- Nick Cross <ncross(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1000350|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000350] from ON_QA to MODIFIED > DroolsEventProcessor should fail deployment if rule not found > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-258 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-258 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.M1 > > > If the named rule does not exist, or has an error, then the EPN should fail to deploy. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (RTGOV-262) ReplyTo field not set in response events when exception is thrown by swyd service

by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] RH Bugzilla Integration commented on RTGOV-262: ----------------------------------------------- Nick Cross <ncross(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1004314|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004314] from ON_QA to MODIFIED > ReplyTo field not set in response events when exception is thrown by swyd service > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: RTGOV-262 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RTGOV-262 > Project: RTGov (Run Time Governance) > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gary Brown > Assignee: Gary Brown > Fix For: 2.0.0.M1 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

overlord-issues September 2013