[overlord-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ARTIF-674) Separate from the S-RAMP spec

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARTIF-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Brett Meyer commented on ARTIF-674: ----------------------------------- Re-opening for consideration in 2.0. I recently started a thread on the S-RAMP spec mailing list, asking whether or not the members were interested in continuing the work. It's been extremely silent since last year. It's looking more and more like the spec is dead. IBM and WSO2, the 2 other major players, confirmed they're out. Everyone else is silent. I've honestly stopped caring about conformance in Artificer 1.x. Most of the non-conformance is due to sheer necessity or performance problems caused by the nature of a few requirements. The issues could potentially be addressed in a new spec version, but there's 0 chance of a quorum. I'd rather keep what we have for 1.x (but not worry about conformance), then potentially strip it out entirely for 2.0. The amount of work to maintain is *not* worth it, I think. Further, the spec really ties our hands behind our backs with its model schemas and Atom-based craziness. The new models we're discussing, the general extensibility, and other things on the roadmap will require a more streamlined, simple JSON approach. We could theoretically attempt to maintain an Atom binding in addition to that, but I'd argue that it's pointless. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)