[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARTIF-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Brett Meyer edited comment on ARTIF-674 at 4/9/15 11:27 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Thats actually a really good point. The server-side logic is now all separated from the Atom RESTEasy code, so theoretically, adding an additional JSON binding would be fairly trivial. We'd still get some of the benefits, especially allowing the shell, java client, and UI to use the JSON binding... On the other hand, what Eric brings up is also a good point. I have a *long* queue of issues on the spec's JIRA. The extension support and several others really need corrected. Without them, it's somewhat limiting. was (Author: brmeyer): Thats actually a really good point. The server-side logic is now all separated from the Atom RESTEasy code, so theoretically, adding an additional JSON binding would still be fairly trivial. We'd still get some of the benefits, especially allowing the shell, java client, and UI to use the JSON binding... On the other hand, what Eric brings up is also a good point. I have a *long* queue of issues on the spec's JIRA. The extension support and several others really need corrected. Without them, it's somewhat limiting. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)