mmh... I'm not 100% sure, it depends on how (classloading) i18n messages are loaded through jboss logging. I'll try this and let you know here.Hi,
would there be a way to move these i18n tests into the testsuite? It would be better to avoid having two leftover tests in each module.
Martin Stefanko
Associate Software EngineerJBoss Sustaining Engineering TeamRed Hat Czech s.r.o.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Ron Sigal <rsigal@redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/05/2016 08:51 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
> Il 03/09/2016 18:18, Ron Sigal ha scritto:
>> I can think of a couple of circumstances:
>>
>> 1. I'm the only person in the universe who knows about Resteasy and
>> i18n. <evil_laugh>BwaHaaHaa!!!</evil_laugh>. By the way, I remembered that I did, in fact, write a bit of
> Eheh ;-)
documentation about i18n:
http://docs.jboss.org/resteasy/docs/3.0.19.Final/ .userguide/html/I18N.html
>
>
>> When I noticed that Weinan
>> had created resteasy-wadl, for example, I internationalized it. On the
>> other hand, I never noticed the introduction of
>> resteasy-wadl-undertow-connector. My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)
> Well, that actually have now log message for the user.
>
>> 2. resteasy-fastinfoset-provider and resteasy-multipart-provider, for
>> example, DO HAVE src/test/resources/i18n in branch 3.0.x. It looks like
>> they didn't make it into master branch.
> Ah, interesting.. didn't notice this. We should copy those resources
> back from 3.0.x then...
>
> Thanks
> Alessio
>
--
_______________________________________________
resteasy-dev mailing list
resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev
_______________________________________________ resteasy-dev mailing list resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev
-- Alessio Soldano Web Service Lead, JBoss