Il 07/09/2016 10:01, Martin Stefanko ha scritto:
Hi, 

would there be a way to move these i18n tests into the testsuite? It would be better to avoid having two leftover tests in each module.
mmh... I'm not 100% sure, it depends on how (classloading) i18n messages are loaded through jboss logging. I'll try this and let you know here.

Cheers
Alessio



Martin Stefanko

Associate Software Engineer
JBoss Sustaining Engineering Team
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Ron Sigal <rsigal@redhat.com> wrote:


On 09/05/2016 08:51 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
> Il 03/09/2016 18:18, Ron Sigal ha scritto:
>> I can think of a couple of circumstances:
>>
>> 1. I'm the only person in the universe who knows about Resteasy and
>> i18n. <evil_laugh>BwaHaaHaa!!!</evil_laugh>.
> Eheh ;-)

By the way, I remembered that I did, in fact, write a bit of
documentation about i18n:
http://docs.jboss.org/resteasy/docs/3.0.19.Final/userguide/html/I18N.html .

>
>
>>     When I noticed that Weinan
>> had created resteasy-wadl, for example, I internationalized it. On the
>> other hand, I never noticed the introduction of
>> resteasy-wadl-undertow-connector.
> Well, that actually have now log message for the user.
>
>> 2. resteasy-fastinfoset-provider and resteasy-multipart-provider, for
>> example, DO HAVE src/test/resources/i18n in branch 3.0.x. It looks like
>> they didn't make it into master branch.
> Ah, interesting.. didn't notice this. We should copy those resources
> back from 3.0.x then...
>
> Thanks
> Alessio
>

--
My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)

_______________________________________________
resteasy-dev mailing list
resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev



_______________________________________________
resteasy-dev mailing list
resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev


-- 
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss