Hi Alessio,

as for discussion with Marek, we think the best way would be to omit the new module and add the provider dependencies into the resteasy-client. There is no need for new module as we can use one that is already in the project.


Martin Stefanko

Associate Software Engineer
JBoss Sustaining Engineering Team
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Martin Stefanko <mstefank@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi all,

just wanted to bring this up again. For me it's alright to move these dependencies into the resteasy-client.

Thank you.


Martin Stefanko

Associate Software Engineer
JBoss Sustaining Engineering Team
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Alessio Soldano <asoldano@redhat.com> wrote:
I've followed up on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-1424 , please check there.

Cheers
Alessio


Il 20/06/2016 14:56, Marek Kopecky ha scritto:
Hi all,

in my point of view, resteasy-client should contains dependencies to 
important RESTEasy providers, because users just want to add 
"resteasy-client" dependency to their project and start to using it. But 
it is not possible now, they also need to add some providers (if they 
are not satisfied with text/plain media type). For example, users needs 
to use dependency to resteasy-jackson2-provider, if they have end-point 
in with "@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_XML)".


What providers would you like to have as dependencies in 
resteasy-client? You can answer in 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-1424


Thank you,

Marek

_______________________________________________
resteasy-dev mailing list
resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev



-- 
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss