Hi,

would there be a way to move these i18n tests into the testsuite? It would be better to avoid having two leftover tests in each module.

Martin Stefanko

Associate Software Engineer

JBoss Sustaining Engineering Team

Red Hat Czech s.r.o.

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Ron Sigal <rsigal@redhat.com> wrote:

On 09/05/2016 08:51 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
> Il 03/09/2016 18:18, Ron Sigal ha scritto:
>> I can think of a couple of circumstances:
>>
>> 1. I'm the only person in the universe who knows about Resteasy and
>> i18n. <evil_laugh>BwaHaaHaa!!!</evil_laugh>.
> Eheh ;-)

By the way, I remembered that I did, in fact, write a bit of
documentation about i18n:
http://docs.jboss.org/resteasy/docs/3.0.19.Final/userguide/html/I18N.html .

>
>
>> When I noticed that Weinan
>> had created resteasy-wadl, for example, I internationalized it. On the
>> other hand, I never noticed the introduction of
>> resteasy-wadl-undertow-connector.
> Well, that actually have now log message for the user.
>
>> 2. resteasy-fastinfoset-provider and resteasy-multipart-provider, for
>> example, DO HAVE src/test/resources/i18n in branch 3.0.x. It looks like
>> they didn't make it into master branch.
> Ah, interesting.. didn't notice this. We should copy those resources
> back from 3.0.x then...
>
> Thanks
> Alessio
>

--
My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)

_______________________________________________
resteasy-dev mailing list
resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev