Re: Disabled/Enabled RW - events propagation - questions
Juro, what exactly do you mean by *change event* is triggered even when
working with disabled +pickList+?
Generally, when widget is disabled, user shouldn't be able to interact it,
that's why it shouldn't produce change events.
I guess an expection is a case where you use `setValue`-like method, when
you change the state externally and want to update component even though
interaction is disabled.
Am I missing something?
~ Lukas
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Juraj Húska <jhuska(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hello guys, again me.
I am testing +disabled+ option of the +pickList.+
When I set this option to +true+, than it is disabled as expected
(disabled classes are rendered - user can not interact with it).
However, when I am trying to interact with that +pickList+ with JQuery,
than it state is changed - I guess this is *expected*, as there is no way
to avoid it, we can only disable the functionality which is achieved in
standard way. Right ?
*But,* what is kind of interesting is that *change event* is triggered
even when working with such disabled +pickList+. Is this correct ? IMHO we
can check before triggering of such event whether the RW is enabled. The
question is whether it is needed ? I think it applies to all RWs.
Cheers
Juro
Posted by forums
Original post: https://community.jboss.org/message/844601#844601
_______________________________________________
richfaces-dev mailing list
richfaces-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.2 KB)