3:36 a.m.
Hello guys, again me.
I am testing +disabled+ option of the +pickList.+
When I set this option to +true+, than it is disabled as expected (disabled classes are
rendered - user can not interact with it).
However, when I am trying to interact with that +pickList+ with JQuery, than it state is
changed - I guess this is *expected*, as there is no way to avoid it, we can only disable
the functionality which is achieved in standard way. Right ?
*But,* what is kind of interesting is that *change event* is triggered even when working
with such disabled +pickList+. Is this correct ? IMHO we can check before triggering of
such event whether the RW is enabled. The question is whether it is needed ? I think it
applies to all RWs.
Cheers
Juro
Posted by forums
Original post: https://community.jboss.org/message/844601#844601
12:34 a.m.
Juro, what exactly do you mean by *change event* is triggered even when
working with disabled +pickList+?
Generally, when widget is disabled, user shouldn't be able to interact it,
that's why it shouldn't produce change events.
I guess an expection is a case where you use `setValue`-like method, when
you change the state externally and want to update component even though
interaction is disabled.
Am I missing something?
~ Lukas
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Juraj Húska <jhuska(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hello guys, again me.
I am testing +disabled+ option of the +pickList.+
When I set this option to +true+, than it is disabled as expected
(disabled classes are rendered - user can not interact with it).
However, when I am trying to interact with that +pickList+ with JQuery,
than it state is changed - I guess this is *expected*, as there is no way
to avoid it, we can only disable the functionality which is achieved in
standard way. Right ?
*But,* what is kind of interesting is that *change event* is triggered
even when working with such disabled +pickList+. Is this correct ? IMHO we
can check before triggering of such event whether the RW is enabled. The
question is whether it is needed ? I think it applies to all RWs.
Cheers
Juro
Posted by forums
Original post: https://community.jboss.org/message/844601#844601
_______________________________________________
richfaces-dev mailing list
richfaces-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-dev
9:06 p.m.
Hopefully some code will speak better than words. Consider this snippet of testing
+disable+ option of a +pickList.+
{code:jivemacro_uid=_13837251212174852|class=jive_text_macro jive_macro_code
_jivemacro_uid_13837251212174852}
function test(fixture, element) {
// given
var changeCallback = jasmine.createSpy('changeCallback');
var options = {
disabled: true,
change: changeCallback
};
// when
element.pickList(options);
// then - some interactions with pick list via JQuery - it changes the pickList
(e.g. item is dragged)
runs(function () {
var firstSourceItem = element.find('.source .ui-selectee').first();
var firstTargetItem = element.find('.target .ui-selectee').first();
pickListFragment.dragItem(firstSourceItem, 400, 20);
pickListFragment.dragItem(firstTargetItem, -400, 20);
pickListFragment.selectItem(firstSourceItem);
pickListFragment.clickAddButton(fixture);
pickListFragment.selectItem(firstTargetItem);
pickListFragment.clickRemoveButton(fixture);
});
//however, here I expect that the change callback was not called and it was even
when pickList is disabled
runs(function () {
expect(changeCallback).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
options = {
disabled: false,
};
element.pickList(options);
}
{code}
Is that clear what I am trying to say now ? Am I missing something ?
Posted by forums
Original post: https://community.jboss.org/message/844687#844687
4531
days inactive
4532
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Juraj Húska -
Lukáš Fryč