[JBoss JIRA] (RFPL-2080) Developer guide - resource mapping/optimization - small typos
by Lukáš Fryč (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RFPL-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Lukáš Fryč resolved RFPL-2080.
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.3.0.CR1
Resolution: Done
> Developer guide - resource mapping/optimization - small typos
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RFPL-2080
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RFPL-2080
> Project: RichFaces Planning
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: doc
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final
> Environment: Developer guide
> Reporter: Juraj Húska
> Assignee: Lukáš Fryč
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 4.3.0.CR1
>
> Original Estimate: 15 minutes
> Remaining Estimate: 15 minutes
>
> I have found these small typos in the _Developer guide_, for part dealing with _resource mapping/optimization_:
> _RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION_
> CURRENT: resources are not compressed in a development and during an unit-test to enable a client-side debugging
> MAYBE: resources are not compressed in a development *stage* and during *a unit-testing* to enable a client-side debugging
> CURRENT: resources are compressed in a production and during a system-test to minimize a network bandwidth
> MAYBE: resources are compressed in a production *stage* and during a *system-testing* to minimize a network bandwidth
> _RESOURCE MAPPING_
> CURRENT: This feature can help to solve of following cases:
> MAYBE: This feature can help to *solve following* cases:
> CURRENT: providing alternative versions of a resource
> MAYBE: providing alternative versions *of resources*
> CURRENT: moving resources to servers with static content
> MAYBE: moving resources to servers *serving* static content
> _RESOURCE MAPPING CONFIGURATION FILE_
> CURRENT: A following sample shows a JSF resource with name resourceLibrary:resourceName relocated to a resource anotherResourceLibrary:anotherResourceName:
> MAYBE: A following sample shows a JSF resource with *a* name resourceLibrary:resourceName relocated to a resource anotherResourceLibrary:anotherResourceName:
> CURRENT: It is possible to define additional resource mapping configuration files using a contextual parameter identifying class-path locations where files resides: org.richfaces.resourceMapping.mappingFile (a comma-separated list of class-path files).
> MAYBE: It is possible to define additional resource mapping configuration *files, by using* a contextual parameter identifying *the* class-path locations where files resides: org.richfaces.resourceMapping.mappingFile (a comma-separated list of *the* class-path files).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (RFPL-2079) Component reference - rich:hotKey - small typos
by Lukáš Fryč (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RFPL-2079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Lukáš Fryč resolved RFPL-2079.
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.3.0.CR1
Resolution: Done
> Component reference - rich:hotKey - small typos
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RFPL-2079
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RFPL-2079
> Project: RichFaces Planning
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: doc
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final
> Environment: Component reference
> Reporter: Juraj Húska
> Assignee: Lukáš Fryč
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 4.3.0.CR1
>
> Original Estimate: 15 minutes
> Remaining Estimate: 15 minutes
>
> I have found these small typos for _rich:hotKey in Component Reference_, which should be IMHO fixed:
> CURRENT: attach it with selector attribute to all the elements defined using this selector. This attribute uses syntax for CSS rule selector defined by W3C consortium with some jQuery extensions.
> MAYBE: *attach it to the specific elements by defining selector attribute*. This attribute uses syntax *of the CSS selectors* defined by W3C consortium with some jQuery extensions. *(e.g. which one ?)*
> CURRENT: The key attribute defines the hot key itself which is processed by the component.
> MAYBE: The key attribute defines the hot key *itself, which* is processed by the component.
> CURRENT: The preventDefault attribute specifies whenever hot key binding should prevent default browser-specific actions to be taken (e.g. Ctrl+A hot key selecting all available text, Ctrl+B opening bookmarks bar, etc.).
> MAYBE: The preventDefault attribute specifies *whether the* hot key binding should prevent default browser-specific actions to be taken (e.g. Ctrl+A hot key selecting all available text, Ctrl+B opening bookmarks bar, etc.).
> CURRENT: keydown (default event) is fired when hot key sequence is initiated (keys are down)
> MAYBE: keydown (default event) is fired when *the* hot key sequence is initiated (*the* keys are down)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (RFPL-2078) Component reference - a4j:push - small typos
by Lukáš Fryč (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RFPL-2078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Lukáš Fryč resolved RFPL-2078.
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.3.0.CR1
Resolution: Done
> Component reference - a4j:push - small typos
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RFPL-2078
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RFPL-2078
> Project: RichFaces Planning
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: doc
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final
> Environment: Component reference
> Reporter: Juraj Húska
> Assignee: Lukáš Fryč
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 4.3.0.CR1
>
> Original Estimate: 15 minutes
> Remaining Estimate: 15 minutes
>
> I have found these typos and other things which should be IMHO corrected for the _a4j:push_ in _Component Reference_.
> CURRENT: When you are registering Push servlet in the Servlets 3.0 environments manually, the RichFaces will detect that servlet for Push is already registered and it avoids to initialize it again.
> However be sure to setup the Push servlet to support asynchronous requests - modify the servlet registration in the previous web.xml snippet as follows:
> MAYBE: When you *attempt to register* Push servlet *manually* in the Servlets 3.0 environments, the RichFaces will detect that servlet for Push is already registered*, and* it *avoids initializing* it again.
> *However, be sure* to setup the Push servlet to support asynchronous requests - modify the servlet registration *from* the previous web.xml snippet as follows:
> CURRENT: Sending a message using the TopicsContext involves creating a TopicKey instance (denominator of given message topic) and looking up the TopicsContext used for topic registration and message publishing.
> MAYBE: Sending a message using the TopicsContext*, which was used for registration of topic and message publishing,* involves creating a TopicKey instance (denominator of given message topic) and *look the TopicContext up*.
> CURRENT: Ensure the Create durable subscriber and Delete durable subscriber options are set to true for push functionality.
> MAYBE: Ensure the Create durable subscriber and *the* Delete durable subscriber options are set to true for *proper* push functionality.
> CURRENT: The RichFaces looks for the JMS Connection Factory on the JNDI context /ConnectionFactory by default
> MAYBE: The RichFaces looks for the JMS Connection Factory on the JNDI context /ConnectionFactory by *default.*
> CURRENT: The JMS message which should be propagated to Push needs to be created with method session.createObjectMessage(message);.
> MAYBE: The JMS message which should be propagated to Push needs to be created with *the* method session.createObjectMessage(message);.
> CURRENT: Receiving messages from JMS doesn't differ from receiving messages sent by the TopicsContext or using CDI events.
> MAYBE: Receiving messages from *a JMS queues* doesn't differ from *the* receiving messages sent by the TopicsContext or using a CDI events.
> CURRENT: This example demonstrates a simple use of the <a4j:push> causing an immediate update of page content.
> MAYBE: *The example above* demonstrates a simple use of the <a4j:push> causing an immediate update of *the* page content.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (RFPL-2637) Document automatic Push topic creation
by Lukáš Fryč (JIRA)
Lukáš Fryč created RFPL-2637:
--------------------------------
Summary: Document automatic Push topic creation
Key: RFPL-2637
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RFPL-2637
Project: RichFaces Planning
Issue Type: Enhancement
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: doc
Affects Versions: 4.2.3.Final
Reporter: Lukáš Fryč
Push documentation currently describes the way of creating topics manually.
But in scope of RF 4.2 we have introduced automatic topic creation.
The documentation should be re-work to prefer automatic topic creation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 9 months