Edson:When I run WaltzDB-16 I get only 9K+ rules fired rather than the "normal" 21K+ rules fired. I'm thinking that IF this logic still applies THEN that might explain why WaltzDB-16 does not fire the requisite number of rules.SDGJames OwenFounder October Rules FestSenior Consultant / Architect KBSCTwitter: OctRulesFestBlogs:http://JavaRules.blogspot.com [Rulebased Systems Blog]http://ORF2009.blogspot.com [October Rules Fest Blog]http://exscg.blogspot.com/ [Expert Systems Consulting Group Blog]"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."Sir Isaac Newton in a letter to Robert Hooke, 5 Feb 1676Come to October Rules Fest and stand on the shoulders of the Giants of the industry; if only for a week.
On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Edson Tirelli wrote:
James,
I believe this was related to Drools 2.
What exactly is your problem?
[]s
Edson
2009/8/14 James Owen <jco2009@att.net>
Greetings:Just wondering if this link still applies. If so, I think I may have found an answer to one of my benchmark problems.SDGJames OwenFounder October Rules FestSenior Consultant / Architect KBSCTwitter: OctRulesFestBlogs:http://JavaRules.blogspot.com [Rulebased Systems Blog]http://ORF2009.blogspot.com [October Rules Fest Blog]http://exscg.blogspot.com/ [Expert Systems Consulting Group Blog]"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."Sir Isaac Newton in a letter to Robert Hooke, 5 Feb 1676Come to October Rules Fest and stand on the shoulders of the Giants of the industry; if only for a week.
On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:21 AM, mrhoden@franklinamerican.com wrote:Depending on your number of rules and facts, that amount of memory
will likely be a concern. If I had memory requirements like that I
would honestly look a clips.
-Michael
On Aug 13, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Thomas Frenken <Thomas.Frenken@offis.de>
wrote:Hello,I am interested in running Drools 5 (and especially Drools Fusion)on asomehow<< resource-constrained device for which only a J2SE 1.4 VMistavailable.Since Drools meanwhile requires J2SE 1.5 I thought about backportingit.But before I invest so much effort, I got two questions:1) I have downloaded the sourcecode. At a first glance the only
reason forrequiering J2SE 1.5 is the extensive use of generics. In case I wouldremove all generics from the code, would it be possible to compile
droolsfor a J2SE 1.4 VM runtime in general or are there other more hiddenreasons for requiering J2SE 1.5?
2) I already meantioned I am planning to run drools on a >>somehow<<resourcen-constrained device. I explicitly used the term >>somehow<<
because I am talking of a device with a 400 Mhz CPU and 256 MB RAM(somepeople might laugh about calling this resource-constrained). How about
resource-consumption of drools? Has anyone run drools on a device withsimilar resources?Thanks in advance!Best RegardsThomas Frenken_______________________________________________rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev