Depending on your number of rules and facts, that amount of memory  
will likely be a concern. If I had memory requirements like that I  
would honestly look a clips.

-Michael

On Aug 13, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Thomas Frenken <Thomas.Frenken@offis.de>  
wrote:

Hello,

I am interested in running Drools 5 (and especially Drools Fusion)  

on a

somehow<< resource-constrained device for which only a J2SE 1.4 VM  

ist

available.

Since Drools meanwhile requires J2SE 1.5 I thought about backporting  

it.

But before I invest so much effort, I got two questions:

1) I have downloaded the sourcecode. At a first glance the only  

reason for

requiering J2SE 1.5 is the extensive use of generics. In case I would

remove all generics from the code, would it be possible to compile  

drools

for a J2SE 1.4 VM runtime in general or are there other more hidden

reasons for requiering J2SE 1.5?

2)  I already meantioned I am planning to run drools on a >>somehow<<

resourcen-constrained device. I explicitly used the term >>somehow<<

because I am talking of a device with a 400 Mhz CPU and 256 MB RAM  

(some

people might laugh about calling this resource-constrained). How about

resource-consumption of drools? Has anyone run drools on a device with

similar resources?

Thanks in advance!

Best Regards

Thomas Frenken

_______________________________________________

rules-dev mailing list

rules-dev@lists.jboss.org

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev