Mark

On 30 Mar 2014, at 13:38, Mark Proctor <mproctor@codehaus.org> wrote:

On 30 Mar 2014, at 13:26, kellyajp <kellyajp@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

I'll get that to you on Monday

On 30 Mar 2014, at 12:59, "Mark Proctor [via Drools]" <[hidden email]> wrote:

Are you able to isolate what the FH’s are referencing,
Sorry that should be RT, not FH. RT == RightTuple, FH == FactHandle.
that might give us an idea of where to look. If you look RightTuple’s they will have a ‘sink' reference (network node) and that sink will have an ‘associates’ map. That map is the rules that node is part of. You can use this to identify the offending rule(s), and maybe paste those rules here?

Mark
On 30 Mar 2014, at 09:03, kellyajp <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks

I'll get someone from the team to work on this on Monday. Not sure how easy it will be to isolate but will keep you informed.

Andy
On 28 Mar 2014, at 23:52, "Mark Proctor [via Drools]" <<a href="x-msg://131/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029025&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external">[hidden email]> wrote:

Can you get us a unit test demonstrating this, and we’ll look into it as a priority.

Mark
On 28 Mar 2014, at 15:40, kellyajp <<a href="x-msg://131/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029018&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external">[hidden email]> wrote:

> We have upgraded from Drools 5 -> Drools 6.01 and when repeating the
> processing in each environment we have very different object counts that is
> causing memory to run out on Drools 6:
>
> Below is an extract from a heap dump
>
> In Drools 6 the main objects in the heap are
> 1: 4378006 700480960 org.drools.core.reteoo.RightTuple
>
> Where as in Drools 5 there are way less objects
> 92: 19022 1826112 org.drools.reteoo.RightTuple
>
> Has anyone else had any experience of this issue?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-memory-leak-in-Drools-6-0-1-tp4029010.html
> Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> <a href="x-msg://131/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029018&i=1" target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external">[hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
<a href="x-msg://131/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4029018&i=2" target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external">[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-memory-leak-in-Drools-6-0-1-tp4029010p4029018.html
To unsubscribe from Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: Re: Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1
Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-memory-leak-in-Drools-6-0-1-tp4029010p4029026.html

To unsubscribe from Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: Re: Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1
Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev