Have you looked at the RuleFlow stuff in 4.0.x? That forms the basis of our work to move full process support.I'm just doing a brain dump of how I think I'd like to see the 5.0 apimove, where we move from a rule oriented framework to a knowledge oriented framework for rules and processes. sounds interesting. how exactly do you see processes, integrated in the knowledgebase, other than just calling ordinary java classes in the then part of a rule? Will there be support for other AI-type algorithms?
ChristineA rough namespace and interface mapping could be as follows: org.drools KnowledgeBase <- RuleBase StatefulKnowledgeSession <- StatefulSession -extends both RuleSession and ProcessSession -in theory someone could have a rule or process specific impl although we will continue with the combined approach for now StatelessKnowledgeSession <- StatelessSession RuleSession -contains the rule specific api from WorkingMemory ProcessSession -contains the process specific api from WorkingMemory org.drools.events org.drools.knowledge.defintions KnowledgeDefinitionPackage <- Package -Possible just KnowledgePackage but I like reinforcing that these are definitions org.drools.knowledge.defintions.rules <- org.drools.rule org.drools.knowledge.defintions.processes org.drools.knowledge.defintions.models -will eventually contain our ontology stuff org.drools.knowledge.defintions.models.facttemplate <- org.drools.factemplates org.drools.knowledge.defintions.models.pojo -our current pojo model stuff should probably go here too org.drools.knowledge.engines.rules <- org.drools.reteoo (and common,base, spi etc which will also be refactored)org.drools.knowledge.engines.processes We will create a drools-api module. This will contain all public userapis for all modules in the project, which will allow us to support service frameworks better, such as OSGi. This will also allow us to more easily differentiate from public stable apis and internal apis.To get compability with 4.0.x we'll have a drools4-adapter jar, whichwill keep all the 4.0 names and just wrap and delegate to the new impl. We won't be able to achieve 100% api comptability, but we should be able to for all the most common public apis.Mark _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev