Kris, looking at the ruleflow stuff (not the core, but the .rf stuff), I have a suggestion on how to make it more integrated with the ruleset/package structure.<br><br>At the moment Ruleflow packages are a seperate entity that is merged into a RuleBase as needed.
<br><br>Does anyone have any objections if we add the ability to have ruleflow as part of a rule Package itself? (thus when that package is added to the rulebase, all the processes for ruleflow go along with it)? so a ruleflow.rf
 file for example becomes just another asset like a drl? <br><br>Kris? thoughts? downsides? <br>No need to change the current API.<br><br>Michael