On 4 August 2010 10:51, Mark Proctor <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org">mproctor@codehaus.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">


  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    <br>
    CLEAR is the result of a forced cancellation of an activation,
    either be explicitely calling clear or removing a rule. <br>
    <br>
    I agree we could probably split that out and have a KB_MODIFY, so
    that if the activation is cancelled as a result the rule being
    removed we get a different event.<br>
    <br></div></blockquote><div><br>Just wanted to point this out - removing rules is not what *we* here need to do. It probably only matters when you want to write a nit-picking event logger.<br><br>-W<br><br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    Mark<br>
    <blockquote type="cite"><br>
      Is this intentional?<br>
      <br>
      -W<br>
      </blockquote></div></blockquote></div><br>