Yes, I tested both....

Sadly whilst large images are scaled correctly (to fit) smaller images are expanded to fit the page width :(

So, I try to stick the attribute on large images; but ultimately I still generate the PDF and apply the "scalefit" attribute to any images that don't fit.

On 11 May 2011 16:27, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com> wrote:
Instead of having to do add that for every image, we should fix it on the styles itself.
I created an issue for that long ago:
  https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JDOCBOOKSTYLE-19
If there's a patch, I can fix and release those styles (I did a release of them last week to stop hudson crashing downloading from eclipse repo's).

You didn't happen to test with both images that were to big and those that were to small for a page? :)
Image to big => should be scaled down
Image to small => should NOT be scaled up to fit the page width (looks awe-full).
That might be the tricky part :/

Op 11-05-11 17:04, Michael Anstis schreef:
If you've ever struggled to get an image to scale correctly in the PDF form of our documentation I "discovered" "scalefit" this afternoon.

Set it to "1" on your imagedata and it'll fit perfectly in HTML and PDF :)

<mediaobject>
  <imageobject>
    <imagedata fileref="whatever.png" format="PNG" scalefit="1" >
    </imagedata>
  </imageobject>
</mediaobject



_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev


-- 
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev