Depending on your number of rules and facts, that amount of memory
will likely be a concern. If I had memory requirements like that I
would honestly look a clips.
-Michael
On Aug 13, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Thomas Frenken <
Thomas.Frenken@offis.de>
wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in running Drools 5 (and especially Drools Fusion)
on a
somehow<< resource-constrained device for which only a J2SE 1.4 VM
ist
available.
Since Drools meanwhile requires J2SE 1.5 I thought about backporting
it.
But before I invest so much effort, I got two questions:
1) I have downloaded the sourcecode. At a first glance the only
reason for
requiering J2SE 1.5 is the extensive use of generics. In case I would
remove all generics from the code, would it be possible to compile
drools
for a J2SE 1.4 VM runtime in general or are there other more hidden
reasons for requiering J2SE 1.5?
2) I already meantioned I am planning to run drools on a >>somehow<<
resourcen-constrained device. I explicitly used the term >>somehow<<
because I am talking of a device with a 400 Mhz CPU and 256 MB RAM
(some
people might laugh about calling this resource-constrained). How about
resource-consumption of drools? Has anyone run drools on a device with
similar resources?
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards
Thomas Frenken
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev