Yes - that is right - I forgot the name of it. So the stand alone module needs to stay - or is the source code being merged in with plugin codebase? 

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Lucas Amador <lucazamador@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
drools-assistant is the module that I created to add refactoring support in the eclipse plugin/guvnor. The last weekend I fixed the integration with eclipse and they will be commited in the next days, maybe tomorrow :)

Regards,

Lucas

On 26 October 2010 23:09, Mark Proctor <mproctor@codehaus.org> wrote:
On 26/10/2010 22:57, Michael Anstis wrote:
Hi Geoffrey,

Being relatively new I can't comment on some of the specifics, but I question the following:-
  • drools-assistant
  • drools-atom
  • drools-clips (I believe Mark did this on a rainy weekend, but don't know if it's still supported).
  • drools-container
  • drools-doc\drools-docs (which is actively used?!? Do we need both?)
  • drools-rhq-plugin
  • drools-simulator
  • install
  • src
I have thought for a long time I'd be good to have on the Wiki a summary of what each project represents and what package (JAR) they bundle into.
You just volunteered yourself for your first task next november when you start ;)

Mark


Cheers,

Mike

On 26 October 2010 15:59, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com> wrote:
I am looking at cleaning up the build and moving to maven 3, to make it
faster, more reliable, etc.
I am also actively wondering if some modules or files aren't dead code.
First candidate is drools-atom:

The module drools-atom is in limbo:
- It still exists
- It's not part of any build
- Does it still build? No
-- 'dependencies.dependency.version' is missing for
org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs:jar
- Does it still compile against the latest drools version? Idunno, but
since it's not part of the build, tomorrow's refactor might break it.
- Does anyone use it? If it doesn't build and it isn't released... no?

I don't think that code is useful to anyone in this state. I do think
it's presence alone slightly complicates the drools sources.


What do we do with it?
- [A] remove the directory drools-atom from trunk (it's still retired in
in subversion)
- [B] leave it like it is now. It might be usefull to someone
- [C] add it to the build again, make it work
- [D] create a separate repository "drools-incubator" and move it there

In my opinion:
+1 for [A]
-1 for [B]: either it builds or it's not in trunk


If we all agree that removing dead modules is a good idea, I 'll provide
a list of possible candidates next time.

--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev


_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev



_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev




--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com