In that case having multiple XLSs is probably just fine (unless I am misunderstanding).
Yes, these rules are legal norms electical in my case .
Thanks for reply.
2010/3/10 Michael Neale <michael.neale@gmail.com>:
> There is currently no DSL support for decision tables (there is occasionally
> some talk of it, but not sure if it would help this particular case).
> In your case, I would think that in your case you would need to have
> multiple XLS files (you can make them share data I guess, for what is in
> common).
> I gather in your case you have different rules in different languages - not
> the same rules in multiple languages right?
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:26 PM, philippe rouxel <prouxel.pacte@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I post this, but got no echo:
>>
>> My project is multi-national: the business model is in English, but
>> some rules depend on the user's country (fr, de).
>> This rules have to be edited in the locale language.
>>
>> For editing a rule, the guided rule editor and a DSL are fine.
>>
>> But for a decision table, I did not find a way to use a DSL.
>>
>> So, what is the best strategy:
>> + use a template for each DT and loose the benefits of sharing the
>> translation.
>> + use an expander for each DT that parse a DSL and translate the terms.
>>
>> Or may be an other solution?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Philippe
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home: www.michaelneale.net
> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev