On 10/07/2011 00:20, Mark Proctor wrote:If you want to work on a separate jira for this?On 09/07/2011 23:59, Mikael Lönneberg wrote:Thinking about this some more. We should probably add a "getWarnings" as well as getErrors. Rule overwriting would come with a warning.Hi,Rule replacement is allowed and an important part of a dynamic rule engine. I believe what we do is disallow it from the same resource (should double check that) i.e. a drl that repeats the rule twice is an error. If you load a later resource it will overwrite the previous.
In trying to fix JBRULES-2730 and JBRULES-3063, I noticed that fixing this issue will actually break MiscTest#testRuleReplacement.So should this test case be rewritten to not allow rule replacement, or are there circumstances where rule replacements are allowed and if that is the case what are those circumstances?
We might even find a way build warning filters, a composite set of warnings to fail on, but user defineable.
Sounds like a bug, can you update some stronger tests and fix?
ConsequenceOffsetTest.testConsequenceOffset also fails due to loading two resource files with the same package and rule name defined in the different files.
Mark
Kind regards
Mikael Lonneberg - gwendo
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev