Each time this "rule 2" fires and retracts a CheeseFact that was in $cheese from rule1, the $cheese list will be reduced by one. So there should be no null pointers here.IRC: interesting topic: use of lists using "from" in LHS and iterated over in RHS HI,
There was an interesting discussion today on IRC; a user "jochen" reported NPEs when trying to iterate lists in the RHS constructed in the LHS using "from collect".
I was wondering how Drools handles lists constructed in the LHS; if the list contained 5 elements but another rule retracted one of those elements would the list available in the RHS contain 4 or 5 elements?
Here's a simplification of what was posted at http://pastebin.com/yKGSxFkA
Rule 1
when
$cheese : ArrayList() from collect(CheeseFact());
then
for(int i=0; i<$cheese.size(); i++) {
//Something useful…
}
endWhat if there was another rule that did something like this:-
Rule 2
When
$cf : CheeseFact(type == "chedder")
Then
retract($cf);
end
What would be the list Rule 1 iterates?
I'd assume since I believe activation execution to be serial it would depend on the agenda's conflict resolution strategy or rule salience?
What would be the learned opinion?
With kind regards,
Mike
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev