Ok, I'll look at those features... and when I get them working I'll be pleased to help documenting them :) with examples...

Thanks.

On 03-07-2007, at 16:40, Edson Tirelli wrote:


   Felipe,

   Thanks. I'm working on it.

   BTW, I forgot to mention, what you are doing to control rules is a not a good way to do it. You should try agenda-group+lock-on-active rule attributes instead.
   Look at the conway's game of life as an example, and maybe help us document the feature... :)

   []s
   Edson

2007/7/3, Felipe Piccolini < felipe.piccolini@bluesoft.cl>:
Edson,

Thanks for the reply... it is nasty... 

Jira created...

Thanks

PD: duplicated email because I forgot to cut the huge-company-signature... :)

On 03-07-2007, at 14:18, Edson Tirelli wrote:


   Felipe,

   Ok, this is a nasty damn bug. :(

   I'm working on a solution for it right now. May I ask you please to open a JIRA for it and attach your code bellow?

   Thank you,
        Edson

2007/7/3, Felipe Piccolini < felipe.piccolini@bluesoft.cl>:
I know I already asked this in a previous email, but no answer and diferent subject... so I'll ask again 

I have an issue using update in 2 rules that update the same object... a loop is created even when I try to
avoid the loop adding an extra condition to each rule... Im inserting an ArrayList as a fact too, so I can check
the extra condition...

Can anyone tell me how to fix this?

Consider this:
//-------RULES-----------------------------
package cl.bluesoft.test

#list any import classes here.
import java.util.List
import java.util.ArrayList

import cl.bluesoft.test.rules.Fact

#declare any global variables here

rule "test update A"
    salience 699
    no-loop  
when
$f : Fact($n: number > 0)
$list: ArrayList( this excludes "key1" )
then
System.out.println( "A-fact number1:"+$f.getNumber()+ " list 1:"+$list);
$list.add( "key1" );
$f.setNumber($n + 1);
update ($f);
update ($list);
System.out.println("A-fact number2:" +$f.getNumber()+" list 2:" +$list);
end


rule "test update B"
    salience 699
    no-loop  
when
$f : Fact($n: number > 1)
$list: ArrayList( this excludes "key2" )
then
System.out.println( "B-fact number1:" +$f.getNumber()+" list 1:" +$list);
$list.add("key2" );
$f.setNumber($n + 1);
update ($f);
update ($list);
System.out.println("B-fact number2:" +$f.getNumber()+ " list 2:"+$list);
end

//-------FACT-----------------------------
public class Fact implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 331627137981862975L;

private int number;

public Fact(int number){
this.number = number;
}

public Fact(){
this(0);
}

/**
 * @return the number
 */
public int getNumber() {
return number;
}

/**
 * @param number the number to set
 */
public void setNumber(int number) {
this.number = number;
}

}

//------TEST---------
public class TestUpdateFact implements Serializable {

private static final long serialVersionUID = -574789596641083743L;

/**
* @param args
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
RuleBase ruleBase = RuleBaseFactory.newRuleBase();
Package pkg = builder.getPackage();
.... 
WorkingMemory session = ruleBase.getStatefulSession();
...etc etc...

List list = new ArrayList();

Fact fact1 = new Fact(1);

session.fireAllRules();

....etc, etc...

}

}

//--------OUTPUT------------
A-fact number1:1 list 1:[]
A-fact number2:2 list 2:[key1]
B-fact number1:2 list 1:[key1]
B-fact number2:3 list 2:[key1, key2]
A-fact number1:3 list 1:[key1, key2]
A-fact number2:4 list 2:[key1, key2, key1]
B-fact number1:4 list 1:[key1, key2, key1]
B-fact number2:5 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2]
A-fact number1:5 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2]
A-fact number2:6 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1]
B-fact number1:6 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1]
B-fact number2:7 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2]
A-fact number1:7 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2]
A-fact number2:8 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2, key1]
B-fact number1:8 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2, key1]

.... for ever.....

So I have a loop... only when I use update and both rules...  condition about the
list not containing "key1" and "key2" seems not properly chequed... I dont know...

Can somebody help me? Am I missing something here?

Thanks.

                                                                        
Felipe Piccolini M.


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




--
  Edson Tirelli
  Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list

                                                                        
Felipe Piccolini M.


_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev




--
  Edson Tirelli
  Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev



Atentamente,
______________________
Felipe Piccolini Marfull
Jefe de Proyectos
Agustina 1141 Piso 8-B
Santiago

 

Fono    +(56 2) 68830837
E-mail felipe.piccolini@bluesoft.cl