ok good to know.
Someone presented a reasonable case for it to me, they have a large number of rules and small number of facts.
In any case, rule analysis feedback can eventually "warn" people of dangers for certain rule styles. Runtime statistics could also perhaps eventually montior, so there are ways to address it.
Thanks,
Michael.
On 3/26/07, Edson Tirelli <tirelli@post.com> wrote:
Michael,
In 3.1 the default is now to allow self joins (we need to add BIG
warnings to the documentation due to this change) and an option was
added to RuleBaseConfiguration to remove self joins.
[]s
Edson
Michael Neale wrote:
> I know that we by default remove self joins, ie:
>
> when
> Foo()
> Foo()
>
> will not match for the same instance of Foo - is it possible to turn
> that off? I know we talked about it at one point, not sure what the
> latest position is (someone was asking me and I can't recall what our
> final position is). FYI Jess and Jrules both self join by default.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>rules-dev mailing list
>
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3124-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9218-4151
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev