+1 for OWL

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Michael Neale <michael.neale@gmail.com> wrote:
Interesting - well I think there is interest in OWL, maybe RIF and
RuleML is still around, but the others - I haven't heard much?

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Xavier Breton <xavier.breton@acm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for feedback, I'll develop a Semantic Web Drools Module that
> will be the subject of my Master Degree Tesis.
>
> The idea is to use Eclipse Modelling Framework (EMF) for prototyping and
> follow a Model Driven Architecture (MDA) where the source language is
> Semantic of Business Vocabularies and Business Rules (SBVR) and the target
> language is Drools DRL.
>
> The mapping could be (PIM level):
> - Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL)
> - Ontology Web Language (OWL)
> - RuleML
> - Rule Interchange Format (RIF)
> - REWERSE Rule Markup Language (R2ML)
>
> It could be added to the module at the source UML or Entity Relationship
> like models to transform the models into SBVR.
>
> Regards
>
> Xavier Breton
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>



--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev



--
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -