Service:
http://www-cgi.uni-regensburg.de/~brf09510/syntax.html

The grammar syntax is the same as used in DRL.g but stripped of all the antsy additions, and simplified.

@Mark: I'm well aware of the limitations of a 1:1 translation of a parser's grammar into diagrams. I have reduced the splits into separate rules in DRL.g considerably. But what do you want to hide from the users? The syntax is the syntax, and there's no sweet-talking around it after you have reduced all the noise from technical splits.

One thing that might help would be deprecating things like infix or/and.

Some rules can be omitted if they coincide with Java's own rules; just add an explanation.

-W


On 22 September 2010 14:56, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1@ford.com> wrote:
What was the service and was it the ANTLR grammar you uploaded to
generate the images?

Thanks,

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: 22 September 2010 13:38
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: [rules-dev] Drools syntax diagrams - redrawn

I've found this online service and stuffed the Drools grammar into it.

You may see the results while they are still there:
http://www-cgi.uni-regensburg.de/~brf09510/syntax.tmp/x45371x0x0x.ebnf.h
tml

<http://www-cgi.uni-regensburg.de/%7Ebrf09510/syntax.tmp/x45371x0x0x.ebn
f.html
>

-W



_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev