Exactly, I thought that the main point is verify the correctness of the Rules, If I misunderstood that sorry..
On 19 September 2011 17:57, Mauricio Salatino <salaboy@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Jiri,Drools Verifier do that for you? Am I right?
I think this is a misunderstanding. Looking at Drools' Java code takes a Java bug finding program such as findbugs. What Drools Verifier does is: look at DRL code written by Drools users.
Findbugs applied to Drools code is a good idea, but I would opt for this to include fundamental code that's used by Drools and responsible for a considerable number of JIRAs.
-W
Toni Rikkola is the man behind drools verifier, you can talk with him to improve what he has now. I know that Esteban was also playing with that and adding the concept of Working Set. You can talk with him as well.CheersOn Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ansgar Konermann <ansgar.konermann@googlemail.com> wrote:
If I'm eligible to vote, please go for option 1.
Am 19.09.2011 17:14 schrieb "Jiri Svitak" <jsvitak@redhat.com>:_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
- CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com- Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev