On 19/06/2012, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> I'll add something.
>

Nice, thank you.

> I've raised a JIRA to capture a need to shift to a different Excel library
> too: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3549
>

The times for (de)serialization indicate that it isn'n just Excel that
doesn't. But big is big...

-W

> With kind regards,
>
> Mike
>
> On 19 June 2012 10:18, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> A recent post on the users list has led me to investigate DTs with
>> O(10000) rows. While the sample XLS with 26,400 rows and 6 condition
>> and 1 action columns was still manageable, a (my) system may exhibit
>> severe memory problems when the number of rows is increased.
>>
>> Test indicate that ~25,000 rows is just about manageable if you don't
>> need lightning startup for your application - serialization doesn't
>> help here.
>>
>> It would appear that Drools users are (not intentionally) led to
>> believe that Drools' performance is immune against the usual
>> detriments that arise from "large numbers".
>>
>> I think that Section 2.4., Decision Tables in Spreadsheets, should
>> contain a warning.
>>
>> -W
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev