Good idea, I agree.
agree - although "ide" in the name implies it is not for web tools ?--On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com> wrote:
If drools-assistent needs to be implemented in guvnor and the eclipse
plugin,
it should be added to drools-ide-common IIRC :)
Op 27-10-10 07:42, Lucas Amador schreef:
> Ideally it should remain as a separated module, so it can be implemented
> in guvnor and the plugin. But maybe it could be moved to a new folder
> together with the other modules that aren't functional to drools itself.
>
> On 27 October 2010 01:48, Michael Neale <michael.neale@gmail.com
> <mailto:michael.neale@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Yes - that is right - I forgot the name of it. So the stand alone
> module needs to stay - or is the source code being merged in with
> plugin codebase?
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Lucas Amador <lucazamador@gmail.com
> <mailto:lucazamador@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> drools-assistant is the module that I created to add refactoring
> support in the eclipse plugin/guvnor. The last weekend I fixed
> the integration with eclipse and they will be commited in the
> next days, maybe tomorrow :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Lucas
>
> On 26 October 2010 23:09, Mark Proctor <mproctor@codehaus.org
> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
> On 26/10/2010 22:57, Michael Anstis wrote:
>> Hi Geoffrey,
>>
>> Being relatively new I can't comment on some of the
>> specifics, but I question the following:-
>>
>> * drools-assistant
>> * drools-atom
>> * drools-clips (I believe Mark did this on a rainy
>> weekend, but don't know if it's still supported).
>> * drools-container
>> * drools-doc\drools-docs (which is actively used?!? Do
>> we need both?)
>> * drools-rhq-plugin
>> * drools-simulator
>> * install
>> * src
>>
>> I have thought for a long time I'd be good to have on the
>> Wiki a summary of what each project represents and what
>> package (JAR) they bundle into.
> You just volunteered yourself for your first task next
> november when you start ;)
>
> Mark
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On 26 October 2010 15:59, Geoffrey De Smet
>> <ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I am looking at cleaning up the build and moving to
>> maven 3, to make it
>> faster, more reliable, etc.
>> I am also actively wondering if some modules or files
>> aren't dead code.
>> First candidate is drools-atom:
>>
>> The module drools-atom is in limbo:
>> - It still exists
>> - It's not part of any build
>> - Does it still build? No
>> -- 'dependencies.dependency.version' is missing for
>> org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs:jar
>> - Does it still compile against the latest drools
>> version? Idunno, but
>> since it's not part of the build, tomorrow's refactor
>> might break it.
>> - Does anyone use it? If it doesn't build and it isn't
>> released... no?
>>
>> I don't think that code is useful to anyone in this
>> state. I do think
>> it's presence alone slightly complicates the drools
>> sources.
>>
>>
>> What do we do with it?
>> - [A] remove the directory drools-atom from trunk
>> (it's still retired in
>> in subversion)
>> - [B] leave it like it is now. It might be usefull to
>> someone
>> - [C] add it to the build again, make it work
>> - [D] create a separate repository "drools-incubator"
>> and move it there
>>
>> In my opinion:
>> +1 for [A]
>> -1 for [B]: either it builds or it's not in trunk
>>
>>
>> If we all agree that removing dead modules is a good
>> idea, I 'll provide
>> a list of possible candidates next time.
>>
>> --
>> With kind regards,
>> Geoffrey De Smet
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev