Great, excellent. We can work on that for Drools 6.0. If in the meantime, my pull requests can be applied, that should be fantastic to allow one of our customer to finish its POC. 


On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor@codehaus.org> wrote:
Charles,

In Drools 6.0, was OSGi is broken - new modules where added, existing ones changed, and OSGi stuff was not updated to track this.

We are also about to do  a refactor of jars, to avoid split packaging. All jars will follow a convention of using the jar name for package namespace. We will hopefully do this within the next week or so.

We probably need to discuss how all of this impacts your kiraf stuff.

Mark
On 22 Feb 2013, at 16:12, Charles Moulliard <ch007m@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

I have finished the project to deploy drools top of apache-karaf (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-49).

Before to commit the project, I would like to ask you where  you would like that I commit what is specific to karaf :

(A) Into a GitHub repository (drools-karaf) or 

(B) Move my drools-karaf project under droolsjbpm-integration ?

Regards,

--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com




--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev


_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev



--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com